Mitzvotמצוות

The Mitzvah of Shechicha: The Forgotten Sheaf

Sources explore the Torah obligation to leave behind accidentally forgotten sheaves of grain during harvest as a gift to the poor, including the biblical commandment, Talmudic definitions of what constitutes forgetting, Maimonidean codification, and the spiritual significance of this unique mitzvah fulfilled through unintentional action.

לְמַעַן יְבָרֶכְךָ יְהֹוָה אֱלֹהֶיךָ בְּכֹל מַעֲשֵׂה יָדֶךָ

7 sources · all verified

Opens as a working sheet — explore, annotate, and export.

Source 1 · Tanach
Verified

Devarim – Shikcha Extended to Olive Trees and Vineyards

דברים כ״ד:כ׳-כ״א

Deuteronomy 24:20-21

The Torah extends the concept of shechicha to olive trees and vineyards: when beating olive trees, one may not go over the branches a second time; when harvesting grapes, one may not glean what remains — all left for the poor, stranger, orphan, and widow.

כִּ֤י תַחְבֹּט֙ זֵֽיתְךָ֔ לֹ֥א תְפַאֵ֖ר אַחֲרֶ֑יךָ לַגֵּ֛ר לַיָּת֥וֹם וְלָאַלְמָנָ֖ה יִהְיֶֽה׃ כִּ֤י תִבְצֹר֙ כַּרְמְךָ֔ לֹ֥א תְעוֹלֵ֖ל אַחֲרֶ֑יךָ לַגֵּ֛ר לַיָּת֥וֹם וְלָאַלְמָנָ֖ה יִהְיֶֽה׃

When you beat down the fruit of your olive trees, do not go over them again; that shall go to the stranger, the fatherless, and the widow. When you gather the grapes of your vineyard, do not pick it over again; that shall go to the stranger, the fatherless, and the widow.

Why it matters — Demonstrates that shikcha applies beyond grain fields, expanding the mitzvah to other agricultural domains.

Source 2 · Tanach
Verified

Devarim – The Original Commandment

דברים כ״ד:י״ט

Deuteronomy 24:19

The Torah commands that if one forgets a sheaf in the field during harvest, one must not go back to retrieve it — it shall be left for the stranger, orphan, and widow, so that God will bless one's handiwork. This is the foundational source for the mitzvah of shikcha (the forgotten sheaf).

כִּ֣י תִקְצֹר֩ קְצִֽירְךָ֨ בְשָׂדֶ֜ךָ וְשָֽׁכַחְתָּ֧ עֹ֣מֶר בַּשָּׂדֶ֗ה לֹ֤א תָשׁוּב֙ לְקַחְתּ֔וֹ לַגֵּ֛ר לַיָּת֥וֹם וְלָאַלְמָנָ֖ה יִהְיֶ֑ה לְמַ֤עַן יְבָרֶכְךָ֙ יְהֹוָ֣ה אֱלֹהֶ֔יךָ בְּכֹ֖ל מַעֲשֵׂ֥ה יָדֶֽיךָ׃ {ס}

When you reap the harvest in your field and overlook a sheaf in the field, do not turn back to get it; it shall go to the stranger, the fatherless, and the widow—in order that the ETERNAL your God may bless you in all your undertakings.

Why it matters — The primary biblical source for mitzvat shechicha, establishing both its practical law and its charitable purpose.

Source 3 · Chazal
Verified

Mishnah Peah – What Cannot Become Shikcha

משנה פאה ה׳:ז׳

Mishnah Peah 5:7

The Mishnah discusses items that cannot become shikcha, including produce the owner has already touched and intended to collect, and distinguishes between produce set aside intentionally versus accidentally forgotten.

הָעֹמֶר שֶׁשְּׁכָחוּהוּ פוֹעֲלִים וְלֹא שְׁכָחוֹ בַעַל הַבַּיִת, שְׁכָחוֹ בַעַל הַבַּיִת וְלֹא שְׁכָחוּהוּ פוֹעֲלִים, עָמְדוּ עֲנִיִּים בְּפָנָיו אוֹ שֶׁחִפּוּהוּ בְקַשׁ, הֲרֵי זֶה אֵינוֹ שִׁכְחָה:

A sheaf which the workers forgot but not the land owner, or which the land owner forgot but not the workers; or [a sheaf] which the poor stood in front of [and blocked its view], or they covered it up with stubble, it is not considered a forgotten sheaf.

Why it matters — Clarifies the halakhic boundaries of the mitzvah — shikcha requires true forgetfulness, not deliberate leaving.

Source 4 · Chazal
Verified

Mishnah Peah – Laws of the Forgotten Sheaf

משנה פאה ו׳:א׳-ה׳

Mishnah Peah 6:1-5

This chapter of Mishnah Peah defines what constitutes a 'forgotten sheaf' — how many sheaves must be left, what is considered forgotten versus intentionally left, and various cases that determine whether the owner has mentally 'forgotten' the produce.

בֵּית שַׁמַּאי אוֹמְרִים, הֶבְקֵר לָעֲנִיִּים, הֶבְקֵר. וּבֵית הִלֵּל אוֹמְרִים, אֵינוֹ הֶפְקֵר, עַד שֶׁיֻּפְקַר אַף לָעֲשִׁירִים, כַּשְּׁמִטָּה. כָּל עָמְרֵי הַשָּׂדֶה שֶׁל קַב קַב וְאֶחָד שֶׁל אַרְבַּעַת קַבִּין וּשְׁכָחוֹ, בֵּית שַׁמַּאי אוֹמְרִים, אֵינוֹ שִׁכְחָה. וּבֵית הִלֵּל אוֹמְרִים, שִׁכְחָה: הָעֹמֶר שֶׁהוּא סָמוּךְ לַגָּפָה וְלַגָּדִישׁ, לַבָּקָר וְלַכֵּלִים, וּשְׁכָחוֹ, בֵּית שַׁמַּאי אוֹמְרִים, אֵינוֹ שִׁכְחָה. וּבֵית הִלֵּל אוֹמְרִים, שִׁכְחָה: רָאשֵׁי שׁוּרוֹת, הָעֹמֶר שֶׁכְּנֶגְדּוֹ מוֹכִיחַ. הָעֹמֶר שֶׁהֶחֱזִיק בּוֹ לְהוֹלִיכוֹ אֶל הָעִיר, וּשְׁכָחוֹ, מוֹדִים שֶׁאֵינוֹ שִׁכְחָה: וְאֵלּוּ הֵן רָאשֵׁי שׁוּרוֹת. שְׁנַיִם שֶׁהִתְחִילוּ מֵאֶמְצַע הַשּׁוּרָה, זֶה פָּנָיו לַצָּפוֹן וְזֶה פָּנָיו לַדָּרוֹם, וְשָׁכְחוּ לִפְנֵיהֶם וּלְאַחֲרֵיהֶם, אֶת שֶׁלִּפְנֵיהֶם שִׁכְחָה, וְאֶת שֶׁלְּאַחֲרֵיהֶם אֵינוֹ שִׁכְחָה. יָחִיד שֶׁהִתְחִיל מֵרֹאשׁ הַשּׁוּרָה, וְשָׁכַח לְפָנָיו וּלְאַחֲרָיו, שֶׁלְּפָנָיו אֵינוֹ שִׁכְחָה, וְשֶׁלְּאַחֲרָיו שִׁכְחָה, מִפְּנֵי שֶׁהוּא בְּבַל תָּשׁוּב (דברים כד). זֶה הַכְּלָל, כָּל שֶׁהוּא בְּבַל תָּשׁוּב, שִׁכְחָה. וְשֶׁאֵינוֹ בְּבַל תָּשׁוּב, אֵינוֹ שִׁכְחָה: שְׁנֵי עֳמָרִים, שִׁכְחָה, וּשְׁלשָׁה אֵינָן שִׁכְחָה. שְׁנֵי צִבּוּרֵי זֵיתִים וְחָרוּבִין, שִׁכְחָה, וּשְׁלשָׁה אֵינָן שִׁכְחָה. שְׁנֵי הוּצְנֵי פִשְׁתָּן, שִׁכְחָה, וּשְׁלשָׁה אֵינָן שִׁכְחָה. שְׁנֵי גַרְגְּרִים, פֶּרֶט, וּשְׁלשָׁה אֵינָן פֶּרֶט. שְׁנֵי שִׁבֳּלִים, לֶקֶט, וּשְׁלֹשָׁה אֵינָן לֶקֶט. אֵלּוּ כְּדִבְרֵי בֵית הִלֵּל. וְעַל כֻּלָּן בֵּית שַׁמַּאי אוֹמְרִים, שְׁלשָׁה, לָעֲנִיִּים, וְאַרְבָּעָה, לְבַעַל הַבָּיִת:

Bet Shammai says: [That which is] made ownerless only in regard to the poor is indeed ownerless. But Bet Hillel says: it is not ownerless unless ownership is renounced even for the rich, as in the case of the sabbatical year. [If] all of the sheaves in a field are a kav each, and one is four kavs and that one is forgotten: Bet Shammai says: it is not considered forgotten. But Bet Hillel says: it is considered forgotten. A sheaf left near a stone fence, or near a stack [of grain] or near oxen, or near equipment: Bet Shammai says: it is not considered “forgotten”; Bet Hillel says: it is considered “forgotten.” [With regard to sheaves forgotten] at the end of the row, the sheaf lying across from it proves [that the first sheaf has not been forgotten.] [As for] a sheaf that [the owner] took to bring it to the city and forgot it, all agree that it is not considered a “forgotten sheaf.” These are to be considered ends of the rows:If two men begin [to gather] from the middle of the row, one facing north and the other south and they forget [some sheaves] in front of them and behind them, those left in front of them are “forgotten,” but those left behind them are not “forgotten.” If an individual begins from the end of the row and he forgets [some sheaves] in front of him and behind him, those in front of him are not “forgotten”, whereas those behind him are “forgotten,” for this comes under the category of “you shall not go back [to retrieve it].” This is the general rule: anything that can be said to fall under the law “you shall not go back” is considered “forgotten,” but that to which the principle of “you shall not go back” cannot be applied is not considered “forgotten.” Two sheaves [left lying together] are “forgotten,” but three are not “forgotten.” Two bundles of olives or carobs are “forgotten” but three are not “forgotten.” Two flax-stalks are “forgotten”, but three are not “forgotten”. Two grapes are considered “grape gleanings,” but three are not “grape gleanings.” Two ears of grain are deemed “gleanings,” but three are not gleanings.” All these [rulings] are according to Bet Hillel. And concerning them all Bet Shammai says that three [that are left] belong to the poor, and four belong to the owner.

Why it matters — The central Mishnaic tractate governing shikcha, defining its precise parameters in practical law.

Source 5 · Rishonim
Verified

Rambam – Hilkhot Matanot Aniyim: Laws of Shikcha

משנה תורה, הלכות מתנות עניים ה׳:א׳-י״ז

Mishneh Torah, Gifts to the Poor 5:1-17

Rambam codifies the laws of the forgotten sheaf in detail: what defines forgetting (leaving a sheaf and walking past without intent to return), which crops are subject to the law, who may take the produce, and the blessing accrued by unintentional fulfillment.

הָעֹמֶר שֶׁשְּׁכָחוּהוּ פּוֹעֲלִים וְלֹא שְׁכָחוֹ בַּעַל הַשָּׂדֶה. שְׁכָחוֹ בַּעַל הַשָּׂדֶה וְלֹא שְׁכָחוּהוּ פּוֹעֲלִים. שְׁכָחוּהוּ אֵלּוּ וְאֵלּוּ וְהָיוּ שָׁם אֲחֵרִים עוֹבְרִין וְרוֹאִין אוֹתָן בְּעֵת שֶׁשְּׁכָחוּהוּ. אֵינָהּ שִׁכְחָה עַד שֶׁיִּשְׁכְּחוּהוּ כָּל אָדָם. וַאֲפִלּוּ עֹמֶר הַטָּמוּן אִם נִשְׁכָּח הֲרֵי זֶה שִׁכְחָה: הָיָה בַּעַל הַשָּׂדֶה בָּעִיר וְאָמַר יוֹדֵעַ אֲנִי שֶׁהַפּוֹעֲלִים שָׁכְחוּ עֹמֶר שֶׁבְּמָקוֹם פְּלוֹנִי וּשְׁכָחוּהוּ הֲרֵי זֶה שִׁכְחָה. וְאִם הָיָה בַּשָּׂדֶה וְאָמַר כֵּן וּשְׁכָחוּהוּ אֵינָהּ שִׁכְחָה שֶׁהַשָּׁכוּחַ מֵעִקָּרוֹ בַּשָּׂדֶה הוּא הַשִּׁכְחָה. אֲבָל בָּעִיר אֲפִלּוּ זָכוּר וּלְבַסּוֹף שָׁכוּחַ הֲרֵי זוֹ שִׁכְחָה שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (דברים כד יט) "וְשָׁכַחְתָּ עֹמֶר בַּשָּׂדֶה" וְלֹא בָּעִיר: הַקּוֹצֵר שֶׁהִתְחִיל לִקְצֹר מֵרֹאשׁ הַשּׁוּרָה וְשָׁכַח לְפָנָיו וּלְאַחֲרָיו. שֶׁל אַחֲרָיו שִׁכְחָה וְשֶׁלְּפָנָיו אֵינוֹ שִׁכְחָה שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (דברים כד יט) "לֹא תָשׁוּב לְקַחְתּוֹ" אֵינוֹ שִׁכְחָה עַד שֶׁיַּעֲבֹר מִמֶּנּוּ וְיַנִּיחֶנּוּ לְאַחֲרָיו. זֶה הַכְּלָל כָּל שֶׁהוּא בְּבַל תָּשׁוּב שִׁכְחָה וְכָל שֶׁאֵינוֹ בְּבַל תָּשׁוּב אֵינוֹ שִׁכְחָה:

In none [of the following situations] is a [forgotten] sheaf [of grain] considered as shichichah. It was forgotten by workers and not forgotten by the owner of the field; it was forgotten by the owner of the field, but not the workers; or both these individuals forgot it, but there were others passing by who observed them at the time they forgot it. [To be shichichah] it must be forgotten by all people. Even a sheaf that was hidden away [purposely], if it is forgotten, it is shichichah. When the owner of the field was in the city and he said: "I know that the workers forgot a sheaf in this-and-this place," [but afterwards, the owner] forgot it, it is shichichah. If he was in the field and made such statements, but then forgot [the sheaf], it is not shichichah. [The rationale is that,] in a field, [only a sheaf] that was forgotten at the outset is shichichah. In a city, by contrast, even if one remembered it and afterwards forgot it, it is shichichah, as [indicated by Deuteronomy 24:19]: "If you forget a sheaf in the field," [i.e., in the field,] but not in a city. When a person began harvesting from the beginning of a row [of grain] and forgot grain both in front of him and behind him, [the grain] behind him is shichichah, [the grain] in front of him is not shichichah, as [implied by Deuteronomy, loc. cit.,]: "Do not go back to take it." [Grain is] not shichichah unless [the harvester] passes it and leaves it behind him. This is the general principle: Whenever the adjuration "Do not return" applies, [the laws of] shichichah apply. Whenever the adjuration "Do not return" does not apply, [the laws of] shichichah do not apply.

Why it matters — The definitive halakhic codification of shikcha, essential for understanding the law's practical scope.

Source 6 · Rishonim
Verified

Tur – Yoreh De'ah: Laws of Shikcha in Practice

טור, יורה דעה של״ב

Tur, Yoreh De'ah 332

The Tur codifies the practical laws of shikcha — when the obligation applies today (outside the Land of Israel), which produce is subject, and when a farmer has rendered something 'forgotten' in a halakhic sense.

מתנות עניים שהם לקט שכחה ופיאה ופרט ועוללות כתב הרמב"ם שאין נוהגין מן התורה אלא בארץ ובח"ל הם מדרבנן ואם אין שם עניים א"צ להניחם והאידנא אין נוהגין בהן לפי שהרוב נכרי' אם יניחום יבואו נכרי' ויטלום לפיכך איני רוצה להאריך בהם:

Why it matters — An important Rishon-to-Acharon bridge, showing how shikcha's laws were transmitted and applied in post-biblical contexts.

Source 7 · Rishonim
Verified

Sefer HaChinuch – Root of the Mitzvah of Shikcha

ספר החינוך תקצ״ב

Sefer HaChinukh 592

The Chinuch explains that the root of shikcha is to train the heart toward generosity and to remind us that our wealth belongs ultimately to God. He notes the remarkable halakhic feature that this is a mitzvah fulfilled through forgetting, teaching that even one's unconscious acts can carry spiritual merit.

לְהַנִּיחַ לָעֲנִיִּים הַשִּׁכְחָה – שֶׁנִּצְטַוִּינוּ כְּשֶׁנִּשְׁכַּח עֹמֶר בַּשָּׂדֶה לְהַנִּיחוֹ שָׁם, וְלֹא נָשׁוּב לְקַחְתּוֹ כְּשֶׁיִּוָּדַע אֵלֵינוּ הַדָּבָר, וְעַל זֶה נֶאֱמַר (דברים כד יט) וְשָׁכַחְתָּ עֹמֶר בַּשָּׂדֶה לַגֵּר לַיָּתוֹם וְלָאַלְמָנָה יִהְיֶה, כְּלוֹמַר, הַנִּיחֵהוּ שָׁם לָהֶם. מִשָּׁרְשֵׁי הַמִּצְוָה. לְפִי שֶׁהָעֲנִיִּים וְהָאֶבְיוֹנִים בְּחֶטְאָם וּבַעֲנִיּוּתָם תּוֹלִין עֵינֵיהֶם עַל הַתְּבוּאוֹת, בִּרְאוֹתָם בַּעֲלֵי הַשָּׂדוֹת מְאַלְּמִים אֲלֻמִּים בְּתוֹךְ הַשָּׂדֶה כְּבִרְכַּת הַשֵּׁם אֲשֶׁר נָתַן לָהֶם, וְחוֹשְׁבִים בְּלִבָּם לֵאמֹר, מִי יִתֵּן וְהָיָה לִי כֵּן, לֶאֱסֹף עֳמָרִים לְבֵיתִי, וְלוּ אַחַת אוּכַל לְהָבִיא אֶשְׂמַח בָּהּ. וְעַל כֵּן הָיָה מֵחֲסָדָיו בָּרוּךְ הוּא עַל בְּרִיּוֹתָיו, לְמַלֹּאת תְּשׁוּקָתָם זוֹ, כְּשֶׁיִּהְיֶה מִקְרֶה שֶׁיִּשְׁכָּחֶנָּה בַּעַל הַשָּׂדֶה. גַּם יֵשׁ בָּזֶה תּוֹעֶלֶת לְבַעַל הַשָּׂדֶה, שֶׁיִּקְנֶה בָּזֶה נֶפֶשׁ טוֹבָה, כִּי בֶּאֱמֶת בְּמִדַּת הַנְּדִיבוּת וְנֶפֶשׁ בְּרָכָה לְבִלְתִּי תֵּת לִבּוֹ עַל הָעֹמֶר הַנִּשְׁכָּח וְיַנִּיחֵהוּ לָאֶבְיוֹנִים, וְעַל בַּעֲלֵי הַנֶּפֶשׁ טוֹבָה יָנוּחַ בִּרְכַּת הַשֵּׁם לְעוֹלָם.

To leave what is forgotten to the poor: That we were commanded when we forget a sheaf in the field to leave it there, and that we not return to take it when the thing becomes known to us. And about this is it stated (Deuteronomy 24:19), “and you forget a sheaf in the field [...]; it shall go to the stranger, the orphan, and the widow” — meaning to say, leave it there for them. It is from the roots of the commandment [that it is] since the poor and destitute — in their sin and in their poverty — suspend their eyes upon the produce, in their seeing the owners of the field sheaving their sheaves “according to the blessing of the Lord that He gave to them”; and they think in their heart, saying, “If only it will be like this for me, to gather sheaves into my house — and if only I could bring one, I would rejoice in it”; and hence it was from His kindnesses towards His creatures, may He be blessed, to fulfill this desire of theirs when it occurs that the owner of the field forgets it. There is also a benefit for the owner of the field, that he acquires through this a goodly soul; for truly through the trait of generosity and a blessed soul that does not place its heart upon the forgotten sheaf and leaves it to the destitute — on those with such a soul — does the blessing of God descend forever.

Why it matters — Provides a profound philosophical explanation of why shikcha, uniquely performed through forgetfulness, carries spiritual weight.

Related sheets

Mitzvotמצוות

Peah, Leket, and Shikchah: Gifts for the Poor

These sources explore three interconnected biblical mitzvot that require farmers to leave portions of their harvest for the poor and stranger: the corners of the field (peah), fallen gleanings (leket), and forgotten sheaves (shikchah). Through the narrative of Ruth gleaning in Boaz's field, the sources illustrate how this practice embodies both legal obligation and voluntary generosity, shaping a nation of open-hearted givers.

View Sources7 sources
Mitzvotמצוות

The Mitzvah of Shiluach HaKen

Sources addressing the commandment to send away a mother bird before taking her young. The sources span from the Talmud through later codifications, discussing the mitzvah's application, scope, and practical halakhic details.

View Sources11 sources
Mitzvotמצוות

Honoring Parents in Jewish Law

Jewish sources explore the mitzvah of honoring one's father and mother, ranging from its biblical origins in the Torah through detailed Talmudic discussions and codifications in the Shulchan Arukh and other legal authorities. These sources examine both the theoretical foundations and practical applications of this fundamental commandment.

View Sources25 sources
Halachaהלכה

A Minor's Obligation in Returning Lost Property

Sources examine whether a child below bar mitzvah is obligated to return lost property (hashavas aveidah), addressing the minor's legal capacity, the distinction between personal obligation and parental responsibility, and the conditions under which a minor's acquisition of a found object differs from an adult's.

View Sources7 sources
Halachaהלכה

The Captive Woman as Moral Regulation

Sources examine the law of eishes yefas toar (the captive woman) as a halachic response to human impulse in wartime, emphasizing the Torah's regulatory framework—including waiting periods, conversion requirements, and protections against exploitation—rather than as permission for unrestrained conduct. Commentators across traditions interpret the law as a constrained concession that channels desire within ethical and legal boundaries.

View Sources20 sources
Halachaהלכה

Interrupting Torah Study for the Dead

These sources examine whether one must interrupt Torah study or work to accompany a deceased person to burial, and whether the presence of a professional burial society (chevra kadisha) exempts individuals from this obligation. The sources balance the competing values of Torah study, communal responsibility, and honoring the dead.

View Sources16 sources

Explore more