Angels Versus Humans: Who Is Greater?

מָה־אֱנ֥וֹשׁ כִּֽי־תִזְכְּרֶ֑נּוּ וּבֶן־אָ֝דָ֗ם כִּ֣י תִפְקְדֶֽנּוּ׃ וַתְּחַסְּרֵ֣הוּ מְּ֭עַט מֵאֱלֹהִ֑ים וְכָב֖וֹד וְהָדָ֣ר תְּעַטְּרֵֽהוּ׃

what are human beings that You have been mindful of them, mortals that You have taken note of them, that You have made them little less than divine, and adorned them with glory and majesty?

איזהו סייג שעשתה תורה לדבריה. הרי הוא אומר (ויקרא י״ח:י״ט) ואל אשה בנדת טומאתה לא תקרב יכול יחבקנה וינשקנה וידבר עמה דברים בטלים. ת״ל לא תקרב. יכול ישן עמה בבגדיה על המטה. ת״ל לא תקרב. יכול תרחוץ בפניה ותכחול עיניה. ת״ל (שם טו) והדוה בנדתה כל ימים שבנדתה תהיה בנדוי. מכאן אמרו כל המנוולת עצמה בימי נדתה רוח חכמים נוחה הימנה וכל המתקשטת עצמה בימי נדתה אין רוח חכמים נוחה הימנה:

What fence did the Torah make to her words? It is stated, And thou shalt not approach unto a woman … as long as she is impure by her uncleanness. It might be supposed that he may embrace or kiss her, or engage with her in frivolous talk; the text therefore declares, Thou shalt not approach. It might be further supposed that he may sleep with her if she is clothed in the one bed; the text therefore declares, Thou shalt not approach. Again it might be supposed that she may wash her face and paint her eyes; the text therefore declares, And of her that is sick with her impurity—all the days of her impurity she shall be in banishment [from society]. Hence [the Sages] said: Every woman who makes herself unattractive during the period of her impurity wins the approbation of the Rabbis, and she who adorns herself during the period of her impurity incurs their censure.

מָעוֹן — שֶׁבּוֹ כִּיתּוֹת שֶׁל מַלְאֲכֵי הַשָּׁרֵת, שֶׁאוֹמְרוֹת שִׁירָה בַּלַּיְלָה וְחָשׁוֹת בַּיּוֹם, מִפְּנֵי כְבוֹדָן שֶׁל יִשְׂרָאֵל, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״יוֹמָם יְצַוֶּה ה׳ חַסְדּוֹ וּבַלַּיְלָה שִׁירֹה עִמִּי״. שָׁם אוֹפַנִּים וּשְׂרָפִים וְחַיּוֹת הַקֹּדֶשׁ, וּמַלְאֲכֵי הַשָּׁרֵת, וְכִסֵּא הַכָּבוֹד, מֶלֶךְ אֵל חַי רָם וְנִשָּׂא שׁוֹכֵן עֲלֵיהֶם בָּעֲרָבוֹת, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״סוֹלּוּ לָרוֹכֵב בָּעֲרָבוֹת בְּיָהּ שְׁמוֹ״, וּמְנָלַן דְּאִיקְּרִי ״שָׁמַיִם״? אָתְיָא ״רְכִיבָה״ ״רְכִיבָה״, כְּתִיב הָכָא: ״סוֹלּוּ לָרוֹכֵב בָּעֲרָבוֹת״ וּכְתִיב הָתָם: ״רוֹכֵב שָׁמַיִם בְּעֶזְרֶךָ״.

Ma’on, habitation, is where there are groups of ministering angels who recite song at night and are silent during the day out of respect for Israel, in order not to compete with their songs, as it is stated: “By day the Lord will command His kindness, and in the night His song is with me” (Psalms 42:9), indicating that the song of the angels is with God only at night. There, in the firmaments, are the ofanim, the seraphim, the holy divine creatures, and the ministering angels, and the Throne of Glory. The King, God, the living, lofty, exalted One dwells above them in Aravot, as it is stated: “Extol Him Who rides upon the skies [Aravot], Whose name is God” (Psalms 68:5). And from where do we derive that Aravot is called “heaven”? This is learned by using a verbal analogy between two instances of “rides” and “rides”: Here, it is written: “Extol Him Who rides upon the skies [Aravot],” and there, it is written: “Who rides upon the heaven as your help” (Deuteronomy 33:26).

מֵיתִיבִי, הָיָה רַבִּי יְהוּדָה בֶּן תֵּימָא אוֹמֵר: אָדָם הָרִאשׁוֹן מֵיסֵב בְּגַן עֵדֶן הָיָה, וְהָיוּ מַלְאֲכֵי הַשָּׁרֵת צוֹלִין לוֹ בָּשָׂר וּמְסַנְּנִין לוֹ יַיִן. הֵצִיץ בּוֹ נָחָשׁ וְרָאָה בִּכְבוֹדוֹ, וְנִתְקַנֵּא בּוֹ. הָתָם בְּבָשָׂר הַיּוֹרֵד מִן הַשָּׁמַיִם.

The Gemara raises an objection from a baraita to the assertion that eating meat was prohibited to Adam: Rabbi Yehuda ben Teima would say: Adam, the first man, would dine in the Garden of Eden, and the ministering angels would roast meat for him and strain wine for him. The snake glanced at him and saw his glory, and was jealous of him, and for that reason the snake incited him to sin and caused his banishment from the Garden. According to this, evidently Adam would eat meat. The Gemara answers: There the reference is to meat that descended from heaven, which was created by a miracle and was not the meat of animals at all.

"וַיִּפְקַח אֱלֹהִים אֶת עֵינֶיהָ" (בראשית כא,יט), "אָז תִּפָּקַחְנָה עֵינֵי עִוְרִים" (ישעיהו לה,ה), "פָּקוֹחַ אָזְנַיִם וְלֹא יִשְׁמָע" (שם מב,כ), המקביל לנאמר: "אֲשֶׁר עֵינַיִם לָהֶם לִרְאוֹת וְלֹא רָאוּ" (יחזקאל יב,ב).

Besides, you must know that the Hebrew word pakaḥ used in this passage is exclusively employed in the figurative sense of receiving new sources of knowledge, not in that of regaining the sense of sight. Comp., “God opened her eyes” (Gen. 21:19). “Then shall the eyes of the blind be opened” (Isaiah 38:8). “Open ears, he heareth not” (ibid. 42:20), similar in sense to the verse, “Which have eyes to see, and see not” (Ezek. 12:2).