Human Nature Between Angels and Animals

וַיֹּ֣אמֶר אֱלֹהִ֔ים נַֽעֲשֶׂ֥ה אָדָ֛ם בְּצַלְמֵ֖נוּ כִּדְמוּתֵ֑נוּ וְיִרְדּוּ֩ בִדְגַ֨ת הַיָּ֜ם וּבְע֣וֹף הַשָּׁמַ֗יִם וּבַבְּהֵמָה֙ וּבְכׇל־הָאָ֔רֶץ וּבְכׇל־הָרֶ֖מֶשׂ הָֽרֹמֵ֥שׂ עַל־הָאָֽרֶץ׃ וַיִּבְרָ֨א אֱלֹהִ֤ים ׀ אֶת־הָֽאָדָם֙ בְּצַלְמ֔וֹ בְּצֶ֥לֶם אֱלֹהִ֖ים בָּרָ֣א אֹת֑וֹ זָכָ֥ר וּנְקֵבָ֖ה בָּרָ֥א אֹתָֽם׃

And God said, “Let us make humankind in our image, after our likeness. They shall rule the fish of the sea, the birds of the sky, the cattle, the whole earth, and all the creeping things that creep on earth.” And God created humankind in the divine image, creating it in the image of God— creating them male and female.

הוּא הָיָה אוֹמֵר, חָבִיב אָדָם שֶׁנִּבְרָא בְצֶלֶם. חִבָּה יְתֵרָה נוֹדַעַת לוֹ שֶׁנִּבְרָא בְצֶלֶם, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (בראשית ט) כִּי בְּצֶלֶם אֱלֹהִים עָשָׂה אֶת הָאָדָם.

He used to say: Beloved is man for he was created in the image [of God]. Especially beloved is he for it was made known to him that he had been created in the image [of God], as it is said: “for in the image of God He made man” (Genesis 9:6).

דָּרַשׁ רַב נַחְמָן בַּר רַב חִסְדָּא: מַאי דִּכְתִיב ״וַיִּיצֶר ה׳ אֱלֹהִים אֶת הָאָדָם״ בִּשְׁנֵי יוֹדִין? — שְׁנֵי יְצָרִים בָּרָא הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא, אֶחָד יֵצֶר טוֹב וְאֶחָד יֵצֶר רָע. מַתְקִיף לַהּ רַב נַחְמָן בַּר יִצְחָק: אֶלָּא מֵעַתָּה, בְּהֵמָה דְּלָא כְּתִיב בַּהּ ״וַיִּיצֶר״ לֵית לַהּ יִצְרָא? וְהָא קָא חֲזֵינַן דְּמַזְּקָא וְנָשְׁכָא וּבָעֲטָא! אֶלָּא כִּדְרַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן פַּזִּי, דְּאָמַר רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן פַּזִּי ״אוֹי לִי מִיּוֹצְרִי וְאוֹי לִי מִיִּצְרִי״.

Rav Naḥman bar Rav Ḥisda interpreted homiletically: What is the meaning of that which is written: “Then the Lord God formed [vayyitzer] man” (Genesis 2:7), with a double yod? This double yod alludes to that fact that the Holy One, Blessed be He, created two inclinations; one a good inclination and one an evil inclination. Rav Naḥman bar Yitzḥak strongly objects to this: If that is so, does an animal, with regard to whom vayyitzer is not written with a double yod, not have an inclination? Don’t we see that it causes damage and bites and kicks? Rather, interpret the double yod homiletically, in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Shimon ben Pazi, as Rabbi Shimon ben Pazi said: This alludes to the difficulty of human life; woe unto me from my Creator [yotzri] and woe unto me from my inclination [yitzri]. If one opts to follow either his Creator or his inclination, woe unto him from the other.

תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: אָדָם נִבְרָא בְּעֶרֶב שַׁבָּת, וּמִפְּנֵי מָה? שֶׁלֹּא יְהוּ מִינִים אוֹמְרִים: שׁוּתָּף הָיָה לוֹ לְהַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא בְּמַעֲשֵׂה בְרֵאשִׁית. דָּבָר אַחֵר: שֶׁאִם תָּזוּחַ דַּעְתּוֹ עָלָיו, אוֹמֵר לוֹ: יַתּוּשׁ קְדָמְךָ בְּמַעֲשֵׂה בְרֵאשִׁית. דָּבָר אַחֵר: כְּדֵי שֶׁיִּכָּנֵס לַמִּצְוָה מִיָּד. דָּבָר אַחֵר: כְּדֵי שֶׁיִּכָּנֵס לַסְּעוּדָה מִיָּד. מָשָׁל לְמֶלֶךְ בָּשָׂר וָדָם שֶׁבְּנָהּ פַּלְטֵרִין וְשִׁיכְלְלָן, וְהִתְקִין סְעוּדָה, וְאַחַר כָּךְ הִכְנִיס אוֹרְחִין. שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״חׇכְמוֹת בָּנְתָה בֵיתָהּ חָצְבָה עַמּוּדֶיהָ שִׁבְעָה. טָבְחָה טִבְחָהּ מָסְכָה יֵינָהּ אַף עָרְכָה שֻׁלְחָנָהּ. שָׁלְחָה נַעֲרֹתֶיהָ תִקְרָא עַל גַּפֵּי מְרֹמֵי קָרֶת.״

The Sages taught in a baraita (Tosefta 8:7): Adam the first man was created on Shabbat eve at the close of the six days of Creation. And for what reason was this so? So that the heretics will not be able to say that the Holy One, Blessed be He, had a partner, i.e., Adam, in the acts of Creation. Alternatively, he was created on Shabbat eve so that if a person becomes haughty, God can say to him: The mosquito preceded you in the acts of Creation, as you were created last. Alternatively, he was created on Shabbat eve in order that he enter into the mitzva of observing Shabbat immediately. Alternatively, he was created on Shabbat eve, after all of the other creations, in order that he enter into a feast immediately, as the whole world was prepared for him. This is comparable to a king of flesh and blood, who first built palaces [palterin] and improved them, and prepared a feast and afterward brought in his guests. As it is stated: “Wisdom has built her house, and she has hewn out her seven pillars. She has killed her beasts; she has mingled her wine; she has also furnished her table. She has sent forth her maidens; she calls upon the top of the highest places of the city” (Proverbs 9:1–3).

וְכׇל הֵיכָא דִּכְתִיב בְּהֵמָה, גְּרִיעוּתָא הִיא? וְהָכְתִיב ״אָדָם וּבְהֵמָה תוֹשִׁיעַ ה׳״, וְאָמַר רַב יְהוּדָה אָמַר רַב: אֵלּוּ בְּנֵי אָדָם שֶׁהֵן עֲרוּמִין בְּדַעַת, וּמְשִׂימִין עַצְמָן כִּבְהֵמָה! הָתָם כְּתִיב ״אָדָם וּבְהֵמָה״, הָכָא בְּהֵמָה לְחוּדֵּיהּ כְּתִיב.

§ In the previous baraita the Sages derived from the phrase “from the animal” that people who are similar to an animal are included among those from whom offerings are accepted. The Gemara seeks to understand the meaning of the phrase: Similar to an animal, and asks: And everywhere that the word animal is written and interpreted as referring to a person, does it indicate a deficiency? But isn’t it written: “Man and animal You preserve, Lord” (Psalms 36:7), and Rav Yehuda says that Rav says: These are people who are clever in terms of their intellect, like people, and despite their intelligence they comport themselves humbly and self-effacingly, like an animal. The Gemara answers: There it is written “man and animal.” Here, the word “animal” alone is written.

ולפיכך סבירי להו לחכמים שיש זכר ליציאת מצרים אף לימות המשיח, כי איך לא יהיה זכר לסבה עם המסובב, כי מן המדריגה שקנו ישראל כשיצאו ממצרים [י]קנו עוד מדריגה יותר עליונה, ואם לא שהוציאנו ממצרים, ולקח ישראל לו לעם, לא זכו לאותה מעלה עליונה שיקנו לעתיד, כי יציאת מצרים הוא סבה בעצם אל הגאולה העתידה. ולפיכך כשהשיב בן זומא אל דברי חכמים וכי מזכירין יציאת מצרים לעתיד, והלא כתיב "הנה ימים באים וגו'", שמזה יש להוכיח שלא יהיה נזכר יציאת מצרים לעתיד. ועל זה השיבו חכמים לא שתהא יציאת מצרים עיקר, אלא שיהיה שעבוד מלכיות עיקר, ויציאת מצרים טפל לה. וכל זה מפני שאי אפשר שיהיה המסובב בלא הסבה, ולכך ראוי שיהיה עם שעבוד מלכיות זכר אל דבר שהוא סבה אליו, והוא יציאת מצרים. ולפיכך מביא לראיה שם "יעקב" ו"ישראל", שלא נעקר שם "יעקב", כי שם "יעקב" גם כן הוא סבה לשם "ישראל", כי שם "יעקב" נקרא מלשון שהיה יעקב מקטין עצמו כמו עקב, ואין דבר יותר שפל מן העקב, ודבר זה הסבה שיהיה השם יתברך מגביה אותו עד שיקרא "ישראל", על שם "שרית עם אלקים ועם אנשים" (בראשית לב, כח), שכל המשפיל עצמו הקב"ה מגביה אותו (עירובין יג ע"ב). ומפני כך ישראל גם כן נקראו בשתי שמות אלו, כי בשביל שהם מקטינים עצמם הקב"ה מגביה אותם. ומפני כך, אלו שתי הגאולות הם מתחברים ביחד כאילו הם גאולה אחת: ומפני שבארנו בחבור גבורות השם ענין גאולת מצרים, יש לחבר עם זה גאולה אחרונה. וחבור הזה יקרא בשמו נצח ישראל, והטעם מבואר למעלה בתחלה חבור גבורות ה' (סוף הקדמה שלישית), כי בחבור הזה יתבאר כי השם יתברך נתן לישראל הנצחיות, ואינם כלים חס ושלום בגלותם הקשה הכבד. גם כן יתבאר כי יש אל השם יתברך הנצח, שיהיה מנצח מלכות הרביעית שיש לה הממשלה, וכדכתיב (עובדיה א, כא) "ועלו מושיעים בהר ציון לשפוט את הר עשו והיתה לה' המלוכה אחד". אמן כן יהי רצון במהרה בימינו:

Therefore, the Sages maintain that there is a remembrance of the Exodus from Egypt even in the days of the Messiah, for how could there not be a memory of the cause together with its effect? For from the spiritual level that Israel acquired when they left Egypt, they will acquire a still more supreme level, and if He had not taken us out of Egypt and taken Israel to Himself as a people, they would not have merited that supreme level that they will acquire in the future, for the Exodus from Egypt is the essential cause of the future redemption. This is why when Ben Zoma responded to the words of the Sages, asking, "Will the Exodus from Egypt be mentioned in the future? Does it not state, 'Behold, days are coming, etc.'?"—from which it could be proven that the Exodus from Egypt will not be recalled in the future—the Sages answered him that it is not that the Exodus will be primary, but rather that the subjugation of the kingdoms will be primary and the Exodus from Egypt secondary to it. All of this is because it is impossible for the effect to exist without the cause, and therefore it is fitting that along with the memory of the subjugation of the kingdoms, there should be a memory of the thing that is its cause, namely the Exodus from Egypt. This is also why the Talmud brings proof from the names "Jacob" and "Israel," for the name "Jacob" was not uprooted because the name "Jacob" is also the cause of the name "Israel." For the name "Jacob" is so called from the expression that Jacob made himself small like a heel (ekev), and there is nothing lowlier than the heel, and this very thing was the cause for the Lord, may He be blessed, elevating him until he was called "Israel," alluding to "you have striven with God and with men" (Genesis 32:28), for "whoever abases himself, the Holy One, blessed be He, elevates him" (Eruvin 13b). For this reason, Israel is also called by these two names, because it is for the reason that they make themselves small that the Holy One, blessed be He, elevates them. And due to this, these two redemptions are joined together as if they were a single redemption. And because we have explained in the work Gevurot Hashem the matter of the redemption from Egypt, it is fitting to join with it the final redemption. And this work shall be called by its name, Netzach Yisrael (The Eternity of Israel), the reason for which was explained above at the beginning of the work Gevurot Hashem. For in this work, it will be explained that the Lord, may He be blessed, has given to Israel eternity, and they will not, Heaven forfend, perish in their difficult and heavy exile. It will also be explained that the Lord, may He be blessed, possesses Victory, in that He will vanquish the fourth kingdom which holds dominion, as it is written (Obadiah 1:21), “And saviors shall ascend Mount Zion to judge the mount of Esau, and the kingdom shall be the Lord’s.” Amen, so may it be His will, speedily in our days.