Halachaהלכה

Eating Kosher Grasshoppers While Alive

Classical sources examine the halakhic status of kosher locusts and whether they require ritual slaughter before consumption. The sources discuss the identification of permitted species and the permissibility of eating them alive versus processed.

חגבים אין טעונין שחיטה

3 sources · all verified

Opens as a working sheet — explore, annotate, and export.

What the sources say

The foundational point established by the Beit Yosef (Yoreh De'ah 85) — citing Rashi, the Tosafot, the Rosh, and the Rambam — is that grasshoppers require no shechitah at all, unlike quadrupeds and birds.

the Arukh HaShulchan (Yoreh De'ah 85:7) makes explicit that grasshoppers are treated even more leniently than fish in this respect, since their brine raises no prohibition according to the Rambam, the Tur, and the Shulchan Arukh, because they contain no moisture whatsoever.

The practical implication of having no slaughter requirement is confirmed by the Gemara (Chullin 65a–65b), which discusses kosher grasshoppers entirely in terms of physical signs — four legs, four wings, two jumping legs, and wings covering most of the body — with no mention of any killing procedure as a condition of permissibility, strongly supporting the conclusion that a kosher grasshopper may be consumed alive.

Source 1 · Chazal
Verified

Chullin 65a-65b

חולין ס״ה

Chullin 65a-65b

The sugya analyzes the biblical and mishnaic rules of kosher locusts, including which species are permitted and the tradition needed to identify them. It is a central Talmudic locus for the topic.

וּבַחֲגָבִים, כֹּל שֶׁיֵּשׁ לוֹ כּוּ׳. מַאי רוּבּוֹ? אָמַר רַב יְהוּדָה אָמַר רַב: רוֹב אׇרְכּוֹ, וְאָמְרִי לַהּ: רוֹב הֶקֵּיפוֹ. אָמַר רַב פָּפָּא: הִלְכָּךְ בָּעֵינַן רוֹב אׇרְכּוֹ, וּבָעֵינַן רוֹב הֶקֵּיפוֹ. תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: אֵין לוֹ עַכְשָׁיו וְעָתִיד לְגַדֵּל לְאַחַר זְמַן, כְּגוֹן הַזַּחַל – מוּתָּר. רַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר בְּרַבִּי יוֹסֵי אוֹמֵר: ״אֲשֶׁר לֹא כְרָעַיִם״ – אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁאֵין לוֹ עַכְשָׁיו וְעָתִיד לְגַדֵּל לְאַחַר זְמַן. מַאי זַחַל? אָמַר אַבָּיֵי: אַסְקְרָא.

§ The mishna states: And with regard to grasshoppers, any grasshopper that has four legs, and four wings, and two additional jumping legs, and whose wings cover most of its body, is kosher. The Gemara asks: What is considered most of its body? Rav Yehuda said that Rav said: Most of its length. And some say that he said: Most of its circumference. Rav Pappa said: Therefore, one must satisfy both versions of the statement. We require that the wings cover most of its length, and we also require that they cover most of its circumference. The Sages taught in a baraita: A grasshopper that has no wings now but will grow them after a time, e.g., the zaḥal, is permitted. Rabbi Elazar, son of Rabbi Yosei, says: The verse states: “Yet these may you eat of all winged swarming things that go upon all fours, which have [lo] jointed legs above their feet, wherewith to leap upon the earth” (Leviticus 11:21). The word lo is written with the letter alef, meaning not, so that it can be understood as: Do not have jointed legs. This teaches that even though it has no jointed legs now but will grow them after a time, it is still kosher. The Gemara asks: What is the zaḥal? Abaye said: It is called askarin in Aramaic.

Source 2 · Rishonim
Verified

Beit Yosef, Yoreh De'ah 85

בית יוסף, יורה דעה פ״ה

Beit Yosef, Yoreh De'ah 85

Beit Yosef gathers the talmudic and rishonic discussion on kosher locusts and explains the halakhic basis for the Tur's rulings. It is a key commentarial source for the practical law.

חגבים אין טעונין שחיטה כן כתבו שם רש"י והתוס' והרא"ש והביאו ראיות לדבר וכ"כ הרמב"ם בתחלת ה"ש:

Source 3 · Acharonim
Verified

Arukh HaShulchan, Yoreh De'ah 85

ערוך השולחן, יורה דעה פ״ה — ד"ה חגבים אין טעונין שחיטה כדגים ודמן

Arukh HaShulchan, Yoreh De'ah 85:7

Arukh HaShulchan surveys the laws of kosher locusts and discusses the identification tradition and practical limits of the halakhah. It is a major later codification and explanation of the siman.

חגבים אין טעונין שחיטה כדגים ודמן מותר כדגים ואדרבא עוד קילא מדגים דציר דגים טמאים אסור כמ"ש בסי' פ"ג וציר חגבים טמאים פסקו הרמב"ם והטור והש"ע דמותר לפי שאין בהם לחלוחית כלל ומשנה מפורשת היא בעדיות [פ"ז] כלומר דהלחלוחית שלהם הוה כזיעה בעלמא דאין בהם שום שמנונית [וכן מדוייק לשון הלבוש] ומ"מ י"א דצירן אסור דס"ל דהמשנה מיירי לענין הכשר מטומאה וטהרה ולא להיתר אכילה וזהו דעת הראב"ד בעדיות שם וכן משמע בירושלמי תרומות [פ"י] ע"ש והטור והש'"ע לא הביאו דיעה זו [עש"ך סק"ד הביאו בשם יש"ש דצירו אסור אך תערובתן אינו אוסר]: