עקידת יצחק
Akeidat Yitzchak 77:2
Q — The Akeidah opens with eight difficulties on the parsha and resolves them with a single unifying principle. Q (the cluster): Why does the Torah juxtapose the meraglim to Miriam (מרים), teaching they should have learned from her tzaraas, rather than to Korach — whose words against Moshe far more closely resemble Miriam's? Why does Hashem initiate "שלח לך אנשים" as if from Himself, when Devarim records that Israel requested it? Why send tribal princes, and why these and not the nesi'im of the chanukas ha'mizbeach? Why pray only for Yehoshua (כה יושיעך)? Why have them verify whether the land is "good" when Hashem already promised it is? Why is the punishment measured year-for-day (יום לשנה)?
A — An act is categorized not by its external form but by the כוונה — the goal — toward which it is done: יקרא כל פועל רק עפ"י פעולתו אשר יעשה בכוונה מיוחדת לה. Korach's words only resembled lashon hara; his real aim was כבוד and כהונה, so he is named a baal machlokes, not a motzi dibah — hence no juxtaposition to Miriam. Miriam and the meraglim, by contrast, spoke for the speech itself, making both true lashon hara — and the meraglim's sin was precisely that they slandered Eretz Yisrael even with nothing to gain, רק עזבו את ה'. On this principle the whole cluster unwinds: Hashem frames the mission as His own command so the sin is located in the slander, not in the request; the most important men were sent so the nation would accept their report בלי עוררין; the year-for-day is not pure midah-k'neged-midah but a lengthening of the decree as a chesed (העריך והרחיק את העונש), spreading the deaths over 40 years so the innocent children could enter.
יבאר כי המרגלים והנמשכים אחריהם לא את הארץ מאסו כי אם אלוה ממעל. ויבאר טעם מצות ציצית. במדרש (במדבר רבה פ' ט"ז) אריב"ל למה ישראל דומין כשאמרו נשלחה אנשים לפנינו (דברים א׳:כ״ב) למלך שזימן לבנו אשה נאה עשירה ובת טובים אמר