Machshavaמחשבה

Reading Secular Literature in Jewish Life

Jewish sources discuss whether engagement with secular cultural works—including novels and literary classics—can be reconciled with Torah study and spiritual discipline. The sources present varying approaches, from criteria for evaluating whether such reading cultivates wisdom and character, to concerns about distraction and spiritual harm, to frameworks for integrating outside knowledge within a Torah-centered life.

הַלִּמּוּדִים הַמַּעֲשִׂיִּים הֵם מְזוֹנָהּ שֶׁל הַנְּשָׁמָה

10 sources · 9 verified

Opens as a working sheet — explore, annotate, and export.

What the sources say

The sources assembled here do not address English literature as such; rather they speak to the broader question of how one should allocate free time and guard one's mind. Mesillat Yesharim 5:14 warns that idle laughter and levity (שחוק ולצון) are spiritually corrosive, comparing one who is drawn into them to a person drowning in the sea, and urges that any free time be seized for the service of God rather than squandered.

Mesillat Yesharim 13:3-4 articulates the principle of separation (פרישות) — distancing oneself even from permitted things when they might lead, however indirectly, toward something harmful — which sets a general standard of caution about activities that are not inherently forbidden but carry some risk.

Mishneh Torah, Human Dispositions 5:1-3 describes how a Torah scholar's conduct in eating, speech, dress, and all mundane activities should be marked by moderation and dignity, establishing a general ethic of refinement rather than any specific ruling about reading material.

Berakhot 35b:6-8 and Yoma 35b:6-7 discuss the need to balance Torah study with worldly occupation (דרך ארץ) and the judgment one faces for neglecting Torah study, framing the value of time in terms of Torah learning versus labor, not in terms of secular literature specifically.

Kitzur Shulchan Arukh Yalkut Yosef, Orach Chaim 307:27 does address a closely related but distinct question — it speaks of reading romances, tales of war, and other frivolous or lust-inducing fiction (ספר שיש בו דברי חשק ומלחמות), ruling that such material is forbidden to read even on weekdays, let alone on Shabbat, based on the concern of 'do not turn to idols' and that such content arouses the evil inclination. This addresses a narrower category — frivolous and licentious fiction — rather than the broader question of 'English literature classics' as a genre, so it cannot be read as settling the question as posed.

Tanya, Part I; Likkutei Amarim 30:14-16 and Orot HaTorah 6:6-7 likewise do not address literature directly: the former discusses the difficulty of fully turning from evil speech and idle conversation, while the latter distinguishes practical study, which nourishes the soul like food nourishes the body, from higher intellectual and poetic pursuits (הגיון הדעות, השירה), which it likens to the air one breathes — a distinction about types of study and inspiration, not a ruling on secular classics.

Guide for the Perplexed, Part 2 40-48 discusses the difference between a law aimed only at political order and one aimed also at correcting belief and perfecting the intellect, a framework about the purpose of law and intellectual perfection generally, not a statement about reading non-Jewish literature.

Yalkut Reuveni mentions an external wisdom (חכמת בני קדם) said to have been given by Avraham to the sons of the concubines, a passage about the origin of outside wisdom rather than any ruling on whether to engage with it.

Source 1 · Chazal
Verified

Berakhot 35b

ברכות ל״ה ב — ד"ה תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן

Berakhot 35b:6-8

The Talmud contrasts exclusive Torah study with combining Torah and worldly work, and describes different models of how one should relate to ordinary worldly activity. It is foundational for discussing whether secular culture may have a legitimate place alongside Torah.

תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: ״וְאָסַפְתָּ דְגָנֶךָ״ מָה תַּלְמוּד לוֹמַר? — לְפִי שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״לֹא יָמוּשׁ סֵפֶר הַתּוֹרָה הַזֶּה מִפִּיךָ״ — יָכוֹל דְּבָרִים כִּכְתָבָן, תַּלְמוּד לוֹמַר: ״וְאָסַפְתָּ דְגָנֶךָ״ — הַנְהֵג בָּהֶן מִנְהַג דֶּרֶךְ אֶרֶץ, דִּבְרֵי רַבִּי יִשְׁמָעֵאל. רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן יוֹחַאי אוֹמֵר: אֶפְשָׁר אָדָם חוֹרֵשׁ בִּשְׁעַת חֲרִישָׁה, וְזוֹרֵעַ בִּשְׁעַת זְרִיעָה, וְקוֹצֵר בִּשְׁעַת קְצִירָה, וְדָשׁ בִּשְׁעַת דִּישָׁה, וְזוֹרֶה בִּשְׁעַת הָרוּחַ, תּוֹרָה מַה תְּהֵא עָלֶיהָ? אֶלָּא בִּזְמַן שֶׁיִּשְׂרָאֵל עוֹשִׂין רְצוֹנוֹ שֶׁל מָקוֹם — מְלַאכְתָּן נַעֲשֵׂית עַל יְדֵי אֲחֵרִים, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״וְעָמְדוּ זָרִים וְרָעוּ צֹאנְכֶם וְגוֹ׳״, וּבִזְמַן שֶׁאֵין יִשְׂרָאֵל עוֹשִׂין רְצוֹנוֹ שֶׁל מָקוֹם — מְלַאכְתָּן נַעֲשֵׂית עַל יְדֵי עַצְמָן, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״וְאָסַפְתָּ דְגָנֶךָ״. וְלֹא עוֹד אֶלָּא שֶׁמְּלֶאכֶת אֲחֵרִים נַעֲשֵׂית עַל יָדָן, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״וְעָבַדְתָּ אֶת אוֹיְבֶךָ וְגוֹ׳״. אָמַר אַבָּיֵי: הַרְבֵּה עָשׂוּ כְּרַבִּי יִשְׁמָעֵאל, וְעָלְתָה בְּיָדָן. כְּרַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן יוֹחַי, וְלֹא עָלְתָה בְּיָדָן.

The Sages taught: What is the meaning of that which the verse states: “And you shall gather your grain”? Because it is stated: “This Torah shall not depart from your mouths, and you shall contemplate in it day and night” (Joshua 1:8), I might have thought that these matters are to be understood as they are written; one is to literally spend his days immersed exclusively in Torah study. Therefore, the verse states: “And you shall gather your grain, your wine and your oil,” assume in their regard, the way of the world; set aside time not only for Torah, but also for work. This is the statement of Rabbi Yishmael. Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai says: Is it possible that a person plows in the plowing season and sows in the sowing season and harvests in the harvest season and threshes in the threshing season and winnows in the windy season, as grain is separated from the chaff by means of the wind, and is constantly busy; what will become of Torah? Rather, one must dedicate himself exclusively to Torah at the expense of other endeavors; as when Israel performs God’s will, their work is performed by others, as it is stated: “And strangers will stand and feed your flocks, and foreigners will be your plowmen and your vinedressers” (Isaiah 61:5). When Israel does not perform God’s will, their work is performed by them themselves, as it is stated: “And you shall gather your grain.” Moreover, if Israel fails to perform God’s will, others’ work will be performed by them, as it is stated: “You shall serve your enemy whom God shall send against you, in hunger, in thirst, in nakedness and in want of all things” (Deuteronomy 28:48). Summing up this dispute, Abaye said: Although there is room for both opinions, many have acted in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Yishmael, and combined working for a living and learning Torah, and although they engaged in activities other than the study of Torah, were successful in their Torah study. Many have acted in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai and were not successful in their Torah study. They were ultimately forced to abandon their Torah study altogether.

Source 2 · Chazal
Verified

Yoma 35b

יומא ל״ה ב — ד"ה תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן

Yoma 35b:6-7

Chachmei Bavel teach that the poor will be asked why they did not study Torah, and Hillel’s poverty is cited as an example that hardship does not preclude Torah study.

תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: עָנִי וְעָשִׁיר וְרָשָׁע בָּאִין לַדִּין, לֶעָנִי אוֹמְרִים לוֹ: מִפְּנֵי מָה לֹא עָסַקְתָּ בַּתּוֹרָה? אִם אוֹמֵר: עָנִי הָיִיתִי, וְטָרוּד בִּמְזוֹנוֹתַי, אוֹמְרִים לוֹ: כְּלוּם עָנִי הָיִיתָ יוֹתֵר מֵהִלֵּל? אָמְרוּ עָלָיו עַל הִלֵּל הַזָּקֵן שֶׁבְּכׇל יוֹם וָיוֹם הָיָה עוֹשֶׂה וּמִשְׂתַּכֵּר בִּטְרַפָּעִיק, חֶצְיוֹ הָיָה נוֹתֵן לְשׁוֹמֵר בֵּית הַמִּדְרָשׁ, וְחֶצְיוֹ לְפַרְנָסָתוֹ וּלְפַרְנָסַת אַנְשֵׁי בֵיתוֹ. פַּעַם אַחַת לֹא מָצָא לְהִשְׂתַּכֵּר, וְלֹא הִנִּיחוֹ שׁוֹמֵר בֵּית הַמִּדְרָשׁ לְהִכָּנֵס. עָלָה וְנִתְלָה וְיָשַׁב עַל פִּי אֲרוּבָּה כְּדֵי שֶׁיִּשְׁמַע דִּבְרֵי אֱלֹהִים חַיִּים מִפִּי שְׁמַעְיָה וְאַבְטַלְיוֹן.

§ Apropos the great wealth of Rabbi Elazar ben Ḥarsum, the Gemara cites that which the Sages taught: A poor person, and a wealthy person, and a wicked person come to face judgment before the Heavenly court for their conduct in this world. To the poor person, the members of the court say: Why did you not engage in Torah? If he rationalizes his conduct and says: I was poor and preoccupied with earning enough to pay for my sustenance and that is why I did not engage in Torah study, they say to him: Were you any poorer than Hillel, who was wretchedly poor and nevertheless attempted to study Torah? They said about Hillel the Elder that each and every day he would work and earn a half-dinar, half of which he would give to the guard of the study hall and half of which he spent for his sustenance and the sustenance of the members of his family. One time he did not find employment to earn a wage, and the guard of the study hall did not allow him to enter. He ascended to the roof, suspended himself, and sat at the edge of the skylight in order to hear the words of the Torah of the living God from the mouths of Shemaya and Avtalyon, the spiritual leaders of that generation.

Source 3 · Rishonim
Verified

Mishneh Torah, Human Dispositions 5:1-3

משנה תורה, הלכות דעות ה׳:א׳-ג׳

Mishneh Torah, Human Dispositions 5:1-3

Rambam presents the ideal of a wise person whose speech, conduct, and occupation are disciplined and purposeful. The passage supplies a framework for evaluating cultural pursuits by whether they cultivate wisdom and proper character rather than mere indulgence.

כְּשֵׁם שֶׁהֶחָכָם נִכָּר בְּחָכְמָתוֹ וּבְדֵעוֹתָיו וְהוּא מֻבְדָּל בָּהֶם מִשְּׁאָר הָעָם. כָּךְ צָרִיךְ שֶׁיִּהְיֶה נִכָּר בְּמַעֲשָׂיו בְּמַאֲכָלוֹ וּבְמַשְׁקֵהוּ וּבִבְעִילָתוֹ וּבַעֲשִׂיַּת צְרָכָיו וּבְדִבּוּרוֹ וּבְהִלּוּכוֹ וּבְמַלְבּוּשׁוֹ וּבְכִלְכּוּל דְּבָרָיו וּבְמַשָּׂאוֹ וּבְמַתָּנוֹ. וְיִהְיוּ כָּל הַמַּעֲשִׂים הָאֵלּוּ נָאִים וּמְתֻקָּנִים בְּיוֹתֵר. כֵּיצַד. תַּלְמִיד חָכָם לֹא יִהְיֶה גַּרְגְּרָן אֶלָּא אוֹכֵל מַאֲכָל הָרָאוּי לְהַבְרוֹת גּוּפוֹ. וְלֹא יֹאכַל מִמֶּנּוּ אֲכִילָה גַּסָּה. וְלֹא יְהֵא רוֹדֵף לְמַלְּאֹת בִּטְנוֹ כְּאֵלּוּ שֶׁמִּתְמַלְּאִין מִמַּאֲכָל וּמִשְׁתֶּה עַד שֶׁתִּפַּח כְּרֵסָם. וַעֲלֵיהֶם מְפֹרָשׁ בַּקַּבָּלָה (מלאכי ב ג) "וְזֵרִיתִי פֶרֶשׁ עַל פְּנֵיכֶם". אָמְרוּ חֲכָמִים אֵלּוּ בְּנֵי אָדָם שֶׁאוֹכְלִין וְשׁוֹתִין וְעוֹשִׂין כָּל יְמֵיהֶם כְּחַגִּים. וְהֵם הָאוֹמְרִים (ישעיה כב יג) "אָכוֹל וְשָׁתֹה כִּי מָחָר נָמוּת". וְזֶהוּ מַאֲכַל הָרְשָׁעִים. וְשֻׁלְחָנוֹת אֵלּוּ הֵם שֶׁגִּנָּה הַכָּתוּב וְאָמַר (ישעיה כח ח) "כִּי כָּל שֻׁלְחָנוֹת מָלְאוּ קִיא צֹאָה בְּלִי מָקוֹם". אֲבָל הֶחָכָם אֵינוֹ אוֹכֵל אֶלָּא תַּבְשִׁיל אֶחָד אוֹ שְׁנַיִם וְאוֹכֵל מִמֶּנּוּ כְּדֵי חַיָּיו וְדַּיּוֹ. הוּא שֶׁאָמַר שְׁלֹמֹה (משלי יג כה) "צַדִּיק אֹכֵל לְשֹׂבַע נַפְשׁוֹ":

Just as the wise man is recognized through his wisdom and his temperaments and in these, he stands apart from the rest of the people, so, too, he should be recognized through his actions - in his eating, drinking, intimate relations, in relieving himself, in his speech, manner of walking and dress, in the management of his finances, and in his business dealings. All of these actions should be exceptionally becoming and befitting. What is implied? A Torah Sage should not be a glutton. Rather, he should eat food which will keep his body healthy, without overeating. He should not seek to fill his stomach, like those who stuff themselves with food and drink until their bellies burst. They are alluded to by [the statement of] the prophet [Malachi 2:3]: "I will spread dung on your faces, the dung of your feasts." Our Sages explain: These are the people who eat and drink and make all their days like feast days. They say, "Eat and drink, for tomorrow, we will die" (Isaiah 22:13). This is the food of the wicked. It is these tables which the verse censures, saying: "For all tables are full of vomit and excrement; there is no room" (Isaiah 28:8). In contrast, a wise man eats only one dish or two, eating only enough to sustain him. That is sufficient for him. This is alluded to by Solomon's statement: "The righteous man eats to satisfy his soul" (Proverbs 13:25).

Source 4 · Rishonim
Verified

Guide for the Perplexed, Part 2 40-48

מורה נבוכים, חלק ב' מ׳-מ״ח

Guide for the Perplexed, Part 2 40-48

Rambam discusses the purposes of human society, moral formation, and the role of imagination and language in human life. These themes can help assess literature as a formative art while distinguishing moral insight from literary pleasure alone.

5 כשתמצא תורה שכל תכליתה וכל כוונת מנהיגה שקבע את מעשיה אינן אלא הסדרת המדינה ומצביה והסרת העושק והאלימות ממנה, ואין בה שום פנייה לעניינים עיוניים, ואין בה תשומת לב להשלמת הכוח ההוגה, ואין בה התחשבות בדעות, תהיינה נכונות או משובשות, אלא כל כוונתה היא הסדרת מצבי בני האדם אלה עם אלה באיזו דרך שתהיה, ושישיגו אושר מדומה כלשהו לפי דעתו של המנהיג ההוא – אז תדע שהתורה הזאת היא תחיקתית, והמחוקק אותה הוא מן הקבוצה השלישית, כמו שהזכרנו (ב,לז), כלומר מן השלמים בכוח המדמה בלבד. אך כשתמצא תורה שבכל הנהגותיה היא מתייחסת הן לתיקון המצבים הגופניים הן לתיקון ההאמנה, כאמור לעיל, ותשים דגש על מתן דעות נכונות על ה' יתעלה תחילה ועל המלאכים, ותשתדל להחכים את האדם ולתת לו הבנה ולהעירו עד שידע את המציאות כולה בצורתה האמיתית – כי אז תדע שההנהגה הזאת היא מלפניו יתעלה, ושהתורה ההיא אלוהית.

Source 5 · Acharonim
Verified

Mesillat Yesharim 5

מסילת ישרים ה׳:י״ד — ד"ה וּמִלְּבַד כָּל זֶה מָה שֶׁיִּשָּׁאֵר לוֹ

Mesillat Yesharim 5:14

Ramchal analyzes the distractions and time-consuming habits that interfere with spiritual growth. The chapter offers criteria for deciding whether reading is constructive recreation or a form of wasted time and misplaced desire.

וּמִלְּבַד כָּל זֶה מָה שֶׁיִּשָּׁאֵר לוֹ פְּנַאי מֵעֲסָקָיו, אִם חָכָם הוּא וַדַּאי שֶׁלֹּא יְאַבְּדֵהוּ, אֶלָּא יֹאחַז בּוֹ מִיָּד וְלֹא יַרְפֵּהוּ, לַעֲסֹק בּוֹ בְּעֵסֶק נַפְשׁוֹ וְתִקּוּן עֲבוֹדָתוֹ. אַךְ הַשֵּׁנִי, הִנֵּה הוּא קָשֶׁה מְאֹד, וְהוּא הַשְּׂחוֹק וְהַלָּצוֹן, כִּי מִי שֶׁטּוֹבֵעַ בָּם, הוּא כְּמִי שֶׁטּוֹבֵעַ בַּיָּם הַגָּדוֹל שֶׁקָּשֶׁה מְאֹד לְהִמָּלֵט מִמֶּנּוּ. כִּי הִנֵּה הַשְּׂחוֹק הוּא מְאַבֵּד אֶת לֵב הָאָדָם, שֶׁכְּבָר אֵין הַטַּעַם וְהַדֵּעָה מוֹשֶׁלֶת בּוֹ, וַהֲרֵי הוּא כְּשִׁכּוֹר אוֹ שׁוֹטֶה אֲשֶׁר אִי אֶפְשָׁר לָתֵת לָהֶם עָרְמָה אוֹ לְהַנְהִיגָם, כִּי אֵינָם מְקַבְּלִים הַנְהָגָה.

Besides all this, all the free time he has left from his affairs, if he is wise, certainly he should not waste it. But rather to immediately grasp hold of it and not be lax in it, utilizing it to toil in the affairs of his soul and the improvement of his service of G-d. The second detrimental factor, laughter and levity, is very severe. For one who is immersed in these is like one immersed in the great sea, from which it is extremely difficult to escape. For behold, laughter destroys a man's heart until reason and knowledge no longer rule in him. He becomes like a drunkard or a madman whereby it is impossible to give counsel or guide them for they are incapable of accepting any direction.

Source 6 · Acharonim
Verified

Mesillat Yesharim 13

מסילת ישרים י״ג:ג׳-ד׳ — ד"ה וְהִנֵּה כְּלָל הַפְּרִישׁוּת הוּא מָה שֶׁאָמְרוּ

Mesillat Yesharim 13:3-4

Ramchal defines the balanced trait of abstinence: a person need not reject what is permitted, but should avoid being ruled by physical and worldly appetites. This is a useful lens for selecting and limiting secular literature.

וְהִנֵּה כְּלָל הַפְּרִישׁוּת הוּא מָה שֶׁאָמְרוּ זַ"ל (יבמות כ): קַדֵּשׁ עַצְמְךָ בַּמֻּתָּר לְךָ, וְזֹאת הִיא הוֹרָאָתָהּ שֶׁל הַמִּלָּה עַצְמָהּ, פְּרִישׁוּת, רוֹצֶה לוֹמַר, לִהְיוֹת פּוֹרֵשׁ וּמַרְחִיק עַצְמוֹ מִן הַדָּבָר, וְהַיְנוּ, שֶׁאוֹסֵר עַל עַצְמוֹ דְּבַר הֶתֵּר, וְהַכַּוָּנָה בָּזֶה לְשֶׁלֹּא יִפְגַּע בָּאִסּוּר עַצְמוֹ. וְהָעִנְיָן, שֶׁכָּל דָּבָר שֶׁיּוּכַל לְהִוָּלֵד מִמֶּנּוּ גְּרָמַת רַע אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁעַכְשָׁו אֵינוֹ גּוֹרֵם לוֹ וְכָל שֶׁכֵּן שֶׁאֵינֶנּוּ רַע מַמָּשׁ, יִרְחַק וְיִפְרֹשׁ מִמֶּנּוּ.

The general principle of Separation is what our sages of blessed memory said: "sanctify yourself [by abstaining] of what is permitted to you" (Yevamot 20a). This is the meaning of the word "Separation" itself. That is to say - to separate and distance from the thing, prohibiting on oneself something which is permitted. The intent in this is to not come to violate the prohibition itself. The intent is that a person distance and separate from anything which may lead to something which could bring about evil, even though right now it does not cause evil and even though it is not itself evil.

Source 7 · Acharonim
attested

Yalkut Reuveni

ילקוט ראובני, חיי שרה בסוף

Yalkut Reuveni

The passage distinguishes an external wisdom called “the wisdom of the children of the East,” which Abraham gave to the sons of the concubines, from what he gave Isaac.

דע כי יש חכמה חיצונית, ונקראת חכמת בני קדם, היא חכמה שנתן אברהם לבני הפלגשים, וכתיב ויתן אברהם את כל אשר לו ליצחק, ולבני הפלגשים אשר לאברהם נתן אברהם מתנות...

Source 8 · Hasidic
Verified

Tanya, Part I; Likkutei Amarim 30

תניא, חלק ראשון; ליקוטי אמרים ל׳:י״ד-ט״ז — ד"ה וַאֲפִילוּ בִּבְחִינַת ״סוּר מֵרָע״

Tanya, Part I; Likkutei Amarim 30:14-16

The Alter Rebbe emphasizes honest self-assessment and overcoming habits that weaken divine service. Applied to reading, the relevant question is whether literature strengthens or undermines one's actual spiritual discipline.

וַאֲפִילוּ בִּבְחִינַת ״סוּר מֵרָע״, יָכוֹל כָּל אִישׁ מַשְׂכִּיל לִמְצוֹא בְּנַפְשׁוֹ שֶׁאֵינוֹ סָר לְגַמְרֵי מֵהָרָע בַּכֹּל מִכֹּל כֹּל, בְּמָקוֹם שֶׁצָּרִיךְ לְמִלְחָמָה עֲצוּמָה כְּעֵרֶךְ הַנִּזְכָּר לְעֵיל, וַאֲפִילוּ פָּחוֹת מֵעֵרֶךְ הַנִּזְכָּר לְעֵיל, כְּגוֹן לְהַפְסִיק בְּאֶמְצַע שִׂיחָה נָאָה, אוֹ סִיפּוּר בִּגְנוּת חֲבֵירוֹ, וַאֲפִילוּ גְּנַאי קָטָן וְקַל מְאֹד, אַף שֶׁהוּא אֱמֶת, וַאֲפִילוּ כְּדֵי לְנַקּוֹת עַצְמוֹ, כַּנּוֹדָע מֵהָא דְּאָמַר רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן לְאָבִיו רַבֵּינוּ הַקָּדוֹשׁ: ״לָאו אֲנָא כַּתְבֵיהּ, אֶלָּא יְהוּדָא חַיָּיטָא כַּתְבֵיהּ״, וְאָמַר לוֹ: ״כַּלֵּךְ מִלָּשׁוֹן הָרָע״ [עַיֵּין שָׁם בַּגְּמָרָא רֵישׁ פֶּרֶק י׳ דְּבָבָא בַּתְרָא]. וּכְהַאי גַּוְנָא כַּמָּה מִילֵּי דִּשְׁכִיחֵי טוּבָא. וּבִפְרָט בְּעִנְיַן לְקַדֵּשׁ עַצְמוֹ בְּמוּתָּר לוֹ, שֶׁהוּא מִדְּאוֹרַיְיתָא, כְּמוֹ שֶׁכָּתוּב: ״קְדוֹשִׁים תִּהְיוּ וְגוֹ׳״, ״וְהִתְקַדִּשְׁתֶּם וְגוֹ׳״. וְגַם, דִּבְרֵי סוֹפְרִים חֲמוּרִים מִדִּבְרֵי תוֹרָה וְכוּ׳. אֶלָּא שֶׁכָּל אֵלּוּ וְכַיּוֹצֵא בָהֶן, הֵן מֵ״עֲווֹנוֹת שֶׁהָאָדָם דָּשׁ בַּעֲקֵבָיו״, וְגַם נַעֲשׂוּ כְּהֶיתֵּר, מֵחֲמַת שֶׁעָבַר וְשָׁנָה וְכוּ׳.

Even in the category of “turn away from evil,” every intelligent person can discover within himself that he does not turn aside from evil completely and in every respect where a hard battle at a level such as described above is called for, or even on a lesser level than the aforementioned: for example, to stop in the middle of a pleasant gossip, or in the middle of a tale discrediting his fellow, even though it be a very small slur, and even though it be true, and even when the purpose is to exonerate oneself—as is known from what Rabbi Simeon said to his father, our saintly teacher, “I did not write it, but Judah the tailor wrote it,” when his father replied, “Keep away from slander.” [Note there, in the Gemara, beginning of ch.10 of Bava Batra.] The same applies to very many similar things which occur frequently, especially with regard to sanctifying oneself in permissible things, an enactment based on the Biblical text, “You shall be holy…” and “Sanctify yourselves….” Moreover, “Rabbinic enactments are even stricter than Biblical enactments,” and so forth. But all these and similar ones are of the sins which a person tramples underfoot and has come to regard as permissible in consequence of repeated transgression, and so on.

Source 9 · Modern
Verified

Orot HaTorah 6:6-7

אורות התורה ו׳:ו׳-ז׳

Orot HaTorah 6:6-7

Rav Kook discusses the relationship between Torah and general culture and knowledge, including the possibility that outside intellectual materials can be integrated when ordered toward a higher spiritual purpose. It is especially relevant to a broad, non-absolutist approach.

הַלִּמּוּדִים הַמַּעֲשִׂיִּים הֵם מְזוֹנָהּ שֶׁל הַנְּשָׁמָה, בּוֹנִים אוֹתָהּ בַּחֲלָקֶיהָ בְּאוֹתָהּ הַצּוּרָה שֶׁהִיא קְבוּעָה מֵעֶצֶם טִבְעָהּ, כְּדֶרֶךְ שֶׁהַמְּזוֹנוֹת הַגַּשְׁמִיִּים בּוֹנִים אֶת הַגְּוִיָּה, וְהָעִיּוּנִים הָעֶלְיוֹנִים, הֶגְיוֹן הַדֵּעוֹת, הַשִּׁירָה, וְהִתְעַלּוּת הָרוּחַ, הֵם אֲוִירָהּ שֶׁל הַנְּשִׁימָה אֲשֶׁר לַנְּשָׁמָה. כָּל מַה שֶּׁיִּהְיֶה הָאוֹרְגָּן מְכֻלְכָּל בְּמָזוֹן יוֹתֵר מַבְרִיא, יְקַבֵּל יוֹתֵר וְיוֹתֵר אֶת הַשֶּׁפַע הַטּוֹב, שֶׁהָאֲוִיר הַטָּהוֹר מַשְׁפִּיעַ עָלָיו.

Source 10 · Modern
Verified

Kitzur Shulchan Arukh Yalkut Yosef, Orach Chaim, מה מותר לקרוא בשבת 307:27

קיצור שלחן ערוך ילקוט יוסף, Orach Chaim ש״ז:כ״ז — ד"ה מליצות ומשלים של דברי חולין והבל

Kitzur Shulchan Arukh Yalkut Yosef, Orach Chaim, מה מותר לקרוא בשבת 307:27

Rav Yitzchak Yosef states that reading secular works of vanity, novels, war stories, and secular newspapers is prohibited on Shabbat and during the week, and that such material can arouse the evil inclination; those who compose, copy, or print it are considered to cause others to sin and will be held accountable.

מליצות ומשלים של דברי חולין והבל, או ספר שיש בו דברי חשק [רומן] ומלחמות, אסור לקרות בהם בשבת. ואף בחול אסור לקוראם, ועובר משום אל תפנו אל האלילים, לא תפנו אל מדעתכם. ובדברי חשק ועיתונות חילונית מבואר בשלחן ערוך שיש בהם גם איסור משום שמגרה יצר הרע בעצמו. ומי שחיברן ומי שהעתיקן, ואין צריך לומר המדפיסן, מחטיאין את הרבים, ועוונם חמור מאד, ועתידים ליתן את הדין. [ילקוט יוסף שבת ב' עמ' ריב] .

Related sources· 4 found, not yet verifiedSign in to verify
  • Moed Katan 15bunverified

    Filed under: On the Value of Marriage

  • Eruvin 47unverified

    Filed under: On the Value of Marriage

  • Sotah 12aunverified

    Filed under: On the Value of Marriage

  • Eruvin 41bunverified

    Filed under: On the Value of Marriage

Related sheets

Halachaהלכה

Fiction and Torah Study: Halachic Limits

Sources examine whether reading fictional literature constitutes bitul Torah (wasting time from study) or forbidden distraction. They establish that after fulfilling core Torah obligations, purposeful non-Torah activities are permitted, though the permissibility of specific genres depends on their moral content and the reader's intent.

View Sources23 sources
Shabbatשבת

Reading Secular Stories on Shabbat

Jewish law restricts reading secular novels and war stories on Shabbat, viewing them as potentially conducive to weekday thought and frivolous speech. Sources examine when such reading is prohibited, tolerated, or constitutes a neglect of Torah study obligations.

View Sources20 sources
Talmudתלמוד

The Primacy of Gemara Study

Jewish tradition emphasizes Talmud study as central to spiritual development and moral perfection. These sources explain that deep engagement with Gemara is obligatory, foundational to all religious action, and the means by which a person connects intellectually and spiritually with the Divine.

View Sources7 sources
Halachaהלכה

The Proper Use and Respect of Sacred Texts

These sources establish the laws governing how one may handle and use seforim (sacred Jewish texts). They address both the physical respect required when handling holy writings and the spiritual principle that Torah and related texts should not be exploited for personal gain or mundane purposes.

View Sources9 sources
Machshavaמחשבה

The Formative Power of Past Experience

These sources teach that past experiences—whether hardship, failure, or redemption—are not merely historical events to be left behind but formative forces that shape identity and spiritual growth. From biblical commands to remember the wilderness journey to rabbinic teachings on repentance and suffering, the sources emphasize that honest reckoning with one's past is essential to self-understanding and ethical development.

View Sources12 sources
Machshavaמחשבה

Using Sacred Texts for Personal Study

Sources explore whether and how Jewish texts can be studied and utilized for personal spiritual growth and practice. The sources address Torah study as a personal obligation, its transformative power on the individual soul, and the halakhic frameworks governing such study.

View Sources6 sources

Explore more