Halachaהלכה

Women's Torah Study and Gemara Learning

Sources present the classical halakhic debate over whether women may study Torah, particularly the Oral Law (Gemara). The sources include a dispute between Rabbi Eliezer and Ben Azzai in the Mishnah, Rambam's codification of the obligations and restrictions, and Talmudic discussions distinguishing between paternal obligation to teach sons and women's voluntary study.

חַיָּב אָדָם לְלַמֵּד אֶת בִּתּוֹ תוֹרָה

24 sources · 19 verified

Opens as a working sheet — explore, annotate, and export.

What the sources say

The foundational dispute runs through Chazal itself: Mishnah Sotah 3:4 records ben Azzai's view that a father is obligated to teach his daughter Torah so she will understand the laws of the sotah, while Rabbi Eliezer counters that one who teaches his daughter Torah is as if he taught her impropriety (tiflus) — and the Gemara (Sotah 20a–21b) probes Rabbi Eliezer's reasoning, deriving it from the verse in Mishlei that once wisdom enters a person, cunning enters with it.

The exegetical basis for excluding women from the obligation of Torah study is the pasuk Devarim 11:19, which commands teaching 'your sons,' and the Gemara in Kiddushin 29b draws from this that whoever is not commanded to study is not commanded to teach, while Kiddushin 30:1 makes explicit that the verse yields 'your sons but not your daughters.'

The Rishonim codify this framework consistently: Mishneh Torah, Torah Study 1:1–6 states that women, slaves, and minors are exempt from the obligation of Torah study, and the Rambam on Mishnah Sotah 3:4 explains that the mitzva of Torah study applies only to men as derived from 'your sons'; Sefer HaChinukh 419 likewise rules that the commandment applies to males but not females, while noting that a woman who studies Torah does receive reward.

The Shulchan Arukh gives the operative ruling of the classical codifiers: Shulchan Arukh, Yoreh De'ah 246:6 rules that the Sages commanded a person not to teach his daughter Torah because most women are not intellectually prepared and will bring Torah words to frivolity — specifically regarding Oral Torah, which is forbidden, while Written Torah is merely inadvisable but not equivalent to tiflus; the Rema adds that a woman is nonetheless obligated to learn the laws relevant to her own practice.

The Beit Yosef traces these rulings to their Talmudic roots, and Beit Yosef, Yoreh De'ah 246:12 reviews the Rambam's position alongside the Talmudic dispute in Sotah, establishing that a woman earns reward for studying Torah even though her reward is less than that of an obligated man, and that the Sages' prohibition is specifically addressed to the one who teaches, not only to the woman herself.

Several earlier authorities carve out exceptions: Sefer Chasidim 313 distinguishes between the depths of Talmud and the reasons and secrets of Torah — which may not be taught to women or minors — and the practical rulings of the commandments, which a father is obligated to teach his daughters so they can observe Shabbat and other mitzvot; similarly, Magen Avraham 47 notes that women are obligated to learn the laws that pertain to them, as stated in Yoreh De'ah 246:6.

Igros Moshe (YD 3:87) concludes, on our reading of the cited page, that girls in schools such as Bais Yaakov should not be taught Mishnayot, since the Sages forbade teaching Oral Torah to women and likened it to tiflus, but makes an exception for Pirkei Avot on the grounds that it consists of ethical guidance and character development rather than standard Oral Torah content.

Tzitz Eliezer (10:8) is not available in full text for Mekoros to read, but our reading of the cited page indicates that he defends the decisions of recent leading Torah authorities who permitted and established schools to teach girls Torah, arguing that their rulings were necessary to preserve the faith in modern times, and rejects stringent attempts to prohibit all Torah education for girls in the present era.

The question of what may be taught to women in the present generation is addressed directly by B'Mareh HaBazak VII 71:4, which frames the practical question of teaching Oral Torah — including Mishnah — to women today, asking what the position of the poskim is regarding women and Torah study in our times and what subjects are permitted to teach a daughter in the current generation; and Tzitz Eliezer 9:3 concludes, on our reading of the cited page, that a distinction must be drawn between a woman studying Torah on her own initiative — which is permitted and rewarded — and being actively taught by others, and that this resolves an apparent contradiction in the Tosefta which permits women to read Torah and Mishnah.

Source 1 · Tanach
Verified

Deuteronomy 11:19

דברים י״א:י״ט

Deuteronomy 11:19

The biblical phrase 'you shall teach them to your sons' is the textual basis used by the Talmud and later halakhic authorities for the gendered formulation of the parental teaching obligation.

וְלִמַּדְתֶּ֥ם אֹתָ֛ם אֶת־בְּנֵיכֶ֖ם לְדַבֵּ֣ר בָּ֑ם בְּשִׁבְתְּךָ֤ בְּבֵיתֶ֙ךָ֙ וּבְלֶכְתְּךָ֣ בַדֶּ֔רֶךְ וּֽבְשׇׁכְבְּךָ֖ וּבְקוּמֶֽךָ׃

and teach them to your children—reciting them when you stay at home and when you are away, when you lie down and when you get up;

See also

Source 2 · Chazal
Verified

Sotah 20a-21b

סוטה כ׳-כ״א

Sotah 20a-21b

Expands the Mishnah's discussion of women's Torah study, including Rabbi Eliezer's objection and Ben Azzai's position, and distinguishes Torah study that generates merit from other study.

אוֹמֵר בֶּן עַזַּאי: חַיָּיב אָדָם לְלַמֵּד אֶת וְכוּ׳. רַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר אוֹמֵר: כׇּל הַמְלַמֵּד אֶת בִּתּוֹ תּוֹרָה — מְלַמְּדָהּ תִּיפְלוּת. תִּיפְלוּת סָלְקָא דַּעְתָּךְ? אֶלָּא אֵימָא: כְּאִילּוּ לִמְּדָהּ תִּיפְלוּת. אָמַר רַבִּי אֲבָהוּ: מַאי טַעְמָא דְּרַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר, דִּכְתִיב: ״אֲנִי חׇכְמָה שָׁכַנְתִּי עׇרְמָה״, כֵּיוָן שֶׁנִּכְנְסָה חׇכְמָה בְּאָדָם — נִכְנְסָה עִמּוֹ עַרְמוּמִית. וְרַבָּנַן, הַאי ״אֲנִי חׇכְמָה״ מַאי עָבְדִי לֵיהּ? מִיבְּעֵי לֵיהּ לְכִדְרַבִּי יוֹסֵי בְּרַבִּי חֲנִינָא. דְּאָמַר רַבִּי יוֹסֵי בְּרַבִּי חֲנִינָא: אֵין דִּבְרֵי תוֹרָה מִתְקַיְּימִין אֶלָּא בְּמִי שֶׁמַּעֲמִיד עַצְמוֹ עָרוֹם עֲלֵיהֶן, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״אֲנִי חׇכְמָה שָׁכַנְתִּי עׇרְמָה״. אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן: אֵין דִּבְרֵי תוֹרָה מִתְקַיְּימִין אֶלָּא בְּמִי שֶׁמֵּשִׂים עַצְמוֹ כְּמִי שֶׁאֵינוֹ, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״וְהַחׇכְמָה מֵאַיִן תִּמָּצֵא״.

§ The mishna states: From here ben Azzai states: A person is obligated to teach his daughter Torah, so that if she drinks and does not die immediately, she will know that some merit of hers has delayed her punishment. Rabbi Eliezer says: Anyone who teaches his daughter Torah is teaching her promiscuity. The Gemara asks: Could it enter your mind to say that teaching one’s daughter Torah is actually teaching her promiscuity? Rather, say: It is considered as if he taught her promiscuity. Rabbi Abbahu says: What is the reason for Rabbi Eliezer’s statement? It is as it is written: “I, wisdom, dwell with cunning” (Proverbs 8:12), which indicates that once wisdom enters into a person, cunning enters with it. Rabbi Eliezer fears that the woman will use the cunning she achieves by learning the wisdom of the Torah to engage in promiscuous behavior. The Gemara asks: And the Rabbis who disagree with him, what do they do with this verse: “I, wisdom, dwell with cunning [orma]”; how do they interpret it? The Gemara responds: He requires that verse for that which Rabbi Yosei, son of Rabbi Ḥanina, states, interpreting the word “orma” as nakedness rather than cunningness, as Rabbi Yosei, son of Rabbi Ḥanina, says: The matters of Torah do not endure except in one who stands naked for them, as it is stated: “I, wisdom, dwell with nakedness [orma]” (Proverbs 8:12). This means that wisdom dwells only in one who is prepared to give away all of his possessions for the sake of Torah study. Rabbi Yoḥanan says: The matters of Torah do not endure except in one who considers himself as one who does not exist, as it is stated: “But wisdom, it can be found in nothingness” (Job 28:12).

Source 3 · Chazal
Verified

Mishnah Sotah 3:4

משנה סוטה ג׳

Mishnah Sotah 3:4

Presents the dispute over whether teaching Torah to a daughter is comparable to teaching her tiflut, and records Ben Azzai's broader position that a father should teach his daughter Torah.

מִכָּאן אוֹמֵר בֶּן עַזַּאי, חַיָּב אָדָם לְלַמֵּד אֶת בִּתּוֹ תוֹרָה, שֶׁאִם תִּשְׁתֶּה, תֵּדַע שֶׁהַזְּכוּת תּוֹלָה לָהּ. רַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר אוֹמֵר, כָּל הַמְלַמֵּד אֶת בִּתּוֹ תוֹרָה, כְּאִלּוּ מְלַמְּדָהּ תִּפְלוּת.

Source 4 · Chazal
Verified

Kiddushin 29b

קידושין כ״ט ב — ד"ה לְלַמְּדוֹ תּוֹרָה

Kiddushin 29b:8

The passage derives from Deuteronomy 11:19 that a father is obligated to teach his son Torah, and that a person must teach himself if not taught by his father; it then establishes that a woman is neither obligated to learn Torah herself nor obligated to teach it to others, since the obligation to teach follows the obligation to learn, and the verse specifies "your sons" rather than daughters.

לְלַמְּדוֹ תּוֹרָה. מְנָלַן? דִּכְתִיב: ״וְלִמַּדְתֶּם אֹתָם אֶת בְּנֵיכֶם״. וְהֵיכָא דְּלָא אַגְמְרֵיהּ אֲבוּהּ מִיחַיַּיב אִיהוּ לְמִיגְמַר נַפְשֵׁיהּ, דִּכְתִיב: ״וּלְמַדְתֶּם״. אִיהִי מְנָלַן דְּלָא מִיחַיְּיבָא? דִּכְתִיב: ״וְלִימַּדְתֶּם״ ״וּלְמַדְתֶּם״, כֹּל שֶׁמְּצֻוֶּוה לִלְמוֹד – מְצֻוֶּוה לְלַמֵּד, וְכֹל שֶׁאֵינוֹ מְצֻוֶּוה לִלְמוֹד – אֵינוֹ מְצֻוֶּוה לְלַמֵּד. וְאִיהִי מְנָלַן דְּלָא מִיחַיְּיבָה לְמֵילַף נַפְשַׁהּ? דִּכְתִיב: ״וְלִימַּדְתֶּם״ ״וּלְמַדְתֶּם״, כֹּל שֶׁאֲחֵרִים מְצֻוִּוין לְלַמְּדוֹ – מְצֻוֶּוה לְלַמֵּד אֶת עַצְמוֹ, וְכֹל שֶׁאֵין אֲחֵרִים מְצֻוִּוין לְלַמְּדוֹ – אֵין מְצֻוֶּוה לְלַמֵּד אֶת עַצְמוֹ. וּמִנַּיִן שֶׁאֵין אֲחֵרִים מְצֻוִּוין לְלַמְּדָהּ? דְּאָמַר קְרָא: ״וְלִמַּדְתֶּם אֹתָם אֶת בְּנֵיכֶם״ אֶת בְּנֵיכֶם, וְלֹא בְּנוֹתֵיכֶם.

§ The baraita teaches that a father is obligated to teach his son Torah. The Gemara asks: From where do we derive this requirement? As it is written: “And you shall teach them [velimadtem] to your sons” (Deuteronomy 11:19). And in a case where his father did not teach him he is obligated to teach himself, as it is written, i.e., the verse can be read with a different vocalization: And you shall study [ulmadtem]. From where do we derive that a woman is not obligated to teach her son Torah? As it is written: “And you shall teach [velimadtem],” which can be read as: And you shall study [ulmadtem]. This indicates that whoever is commanded to study Torah is commanded to teach, and whoever is not commanded to study is not commanded to teach. Since a woman is not obligated to learn Torah, she is likewise not obligated to teach it. The Gemara asks: And from where do we derive that she is not obligated to teach herself? The Gemara answers: As it is written: “And you shall teach [velimadtem],” which can be read as: And you shall study [ulmadtem], which indicates that whoever others are commanded to teach is commanded to teach himself, and whoever others are not commanded to teach is not commanded to teach himself. And from where is it derived that others are not commanded to teach a woman? As the verse states: “And you shall teach them to your sons” (Deuteronomy 11:19), which emphasizes: Your sons and not your daughters.

Source 5 · Chazal
Verified

Kiddushin 82a:2

תלמוד בבלי, קדושין פב א

Kiddushin 82a:2

The Talmud discusses which professions bring men into frequent contact with women and the attendant spiritual dangers. This sugya is foundational for halachic discussions about male teachers instructing female students.

מַתְנִי׳ לֹא יְלַמֵּד אָדָם רַוּוֹק סוֹפְרִים. וְלֹא תְּלַמֵּד אִשָּׁה סוֹפְרִים. רַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר אוֹמֵר: אַף מִי שֶׁאֵין לוֹ אִשָּׁה לֹא יְלַמֵּד סוֹפְרִים. רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר: לֹא יִרְעֶה רַוּוֹק בְּהֵמָה, וְלֹא יִישְׁנוּ שְׁנֵי רַוּוֹקִין בְּטַלִּית אַחַת, וַחֲכָמִים מַתִּירִים.

Source 6 · Chazal
Verified

Nedarim 35b

נדרים ל״ה ב

Nedarim 35b:1

One may teach midrash, halakhot, and aggadot to someone from whom one is prohibited by vow from benefiting, but not Bible; however, one may teach his sons and daughters Bible.

מַתְנִי׳ וְתוֹרֵם אֶת תְּרוּמָתוֹ וּמַעְשְׂרוֹתָיו לְדַעְתּוֹ, וּמַקְרִיב עָלָיו קִינֵּי זָבִין, קִינֵּי זָבוֹת, קִינֵּי יוֹלְדוֹת, חַטָּאוֹת וַאֲשָׁמוֹת. וּמְלַמְּדוֹ מִדְרָשׁ הֲלָכוֹת וְאַגָּדוֹת, אֲבָל לֹא יְלַמְּדֶנּוּ מִקְרָא. אֲבָל מְלַמֵּד הוּא אֶת בָּנָיו וְאֶת בְּנוֹתָיו מִקְרָא.

MISHNA: The mishna proceeds to list other tasks that one may perform for someone who is prohibited by vow from benefiting from him. And he separates his teruma and his tithes, provided that it is with the knowledge and consent of the owner of the produce. And he sacrifices for him the bird nests, i.e., pairs of birds, pigeons and turtledoves, of zavin (see Leviticus 15:13–15); the bird nests of zavot (see Leviticus 15:28–30); the bird nests of women after childbirth (see Leviticus 12:6–8); sin-offerings; and guilt-offerings. And he teaches him midrash, halakhot, and aggadot, but he may not teach him Bible. However, he may teach his sons and daughters Bible.

Source 7 · Chazal
Verified

Kiddushin 30

קידושין ל׳ — ד"ה הֲוָה אָמֵינָא לְשָׂטָן

Kiddushin 30:1

A baraita derives from the verses on teaching Torah that the obligation applies to sons and grandsons, but not to daughters, interpreting "your sons" as an explicit exclusion of daughters.

הוּא דְּאָמַר כִּי הַאי תַּנָּא, דְּתַנְיָא: ״וְלִמַּדְתֶּם אֹתָם אֶת בְּנֵיכֶם״ – אֵין לִי אֶלָּא בְּנֵיכֶם, בְּנֵי בְנֵיכֶם מִנַּיִן? תַּלְמוּד לוֹמַר: ״וְהוֹדַעְתָּם לְבָנֶיךָ וְלִבְנֵי בָנֶיךָ״. אִם כֵּן מָה תַּלְמוּד לוֹמַר: ״בְּנֵיכֶם״ – בְּנֵיכֶם וְלֹא בְּנוֹתֵיכֶם.

The Gemara answers that the tanna of this baraita stated his opinion in accordance with the opinion of that tanna, as it is taught in another baraita: From the verse “And you shall teach them to your sons” I have derived only that you must teach your sons. From where do I derive that there is an obligation to teach your sons’ sons? The verse states: “But make them known to your sons and to your sons’ sons.” If so, what is the meaning when the verse states: “Your sons” (Deuteronomy 11:19), which implies only sons? This limitation teaches: Your sons, but not your daughters.

Source 8 · Chazal
Verified

Berakhot 20b

ברכות כ׳ ב — ד"ה וּבִמְזוּזָה

Berakhot 20b:6

The Gemara teaches that women are obligated in the mitzva of mezuza, and notes that this lesson is necessary to counter the potential inference that since mezuza is juxtaposed in the Torah to Torah study, women would be exempt from mezuza just as they are from Torah study.

וּבִמְזוּזָה. פְּשִׁיטָא! מַהוּ דְתֵימָא: הוֹאִיל וְאִתַּקַּשׁ לְתַלְמוּד תּוֹרָה — קָמַשְׁמַע לַן.

We also learned in the mishna that women are obligated in the mitzva of mezuza. The Gemara asks: That too is obvious. Why would they be exempt from fulfilling this obligation, it is a positive mitzva that is not time-bound? The Gemara replies: Lest you say: Since the mitzva of mezuza is juxtaposed in the Torah to the mitzva of Torah study (Deuteronomy 11:19–20), just as women are exempt from Torah study, so too they are exempt from the mitzva of mezuza. Therefore, the mishna explicitly teaches us that they are obligated.

Source 9 · Rishonim
Verified

Mishneh Torah, Torah Study 1:1-6

משנה תורה, הלכות תלמוד תורה א׳:א׳-ו׳

Mishneh Torah, Torah Study 1:1-6

States the obligation to teach Torah to one's sons and the exclusion of daughters from that parental obligation, while discussing women's own Torah study and the sages' caution concerning teaching Torah she-be'al peh.

נָשִׁים וַעֲבָדִים וּקְטַנִּים פְּטוּרִים מִתַּלְמוּד תּוֹרָה. אֲבָל קָטָן אָבִיו חַיָּב לְלַמְּדוֹ תּוֹרָה שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (דברים יא יט) "וְלִמַּדְתֶּם אֹתָם אֶת בְּנֵיכֶם לְדַבֵּר בָּם". וְאֵין הָאִשָּׁה חַיֶּבֶת לְלַמֵּד אֶת בְּנָהּ. שֶׁכָּל הַחַיָּב לִלְמֹד חַיָּב לְלַמֵּד:

Women, slaves, and minors are free from the obligation of Torah study. Nevertheless, a father is obligated to teach his son Torah while he is a minor, as [Deuteronomy 11:19] states: "And you shall teach them to your sons to speak about them." A woman is not obligated to teach her son, for only those who are obligated to learn are obligated to teach.

Source 10 · Rishonim
Verified

Sefer Chasidim 313

ספר חסידים, שיג

Sefer Chasidim 313

One may teach women the laws of mitzvot so they can observe them properly, but not the deep reasoning, causes, and secrets of Torah; however, women may learn from their father or husband, and the passage cites precedent of a woman attending a scholar's teaching while listening from a distance, since direct one-on-one instruction between an unrelated man and woman is prohibited due to the concern of improper conduct.

חייב אדם ללמוד לבנותיו המצות כגון פסקי הלכות ומה שאמרו שהמלמד לאשה תורה כאלו מלמדה תיפלות זהו עומק תלמוד וטעמי המצות וסודי התורה אותן אין מלמדין לאשה ולקטן אבל הלכות מצות ילמד לה שאם לא תדע הלכות שבת איך תשמור שבת וכן כל מצות כדי לעשות להזהר במצות שהרי בימי חזקיהו מלך יהודה אנשים ונשים גדולים וקטנים ידעו אפילו טהרות וקדשים וזהו הקהל את העם האנשים והנשים והטף וזהו אתם נצבים היום כולכם לפני ה' אלהיכם ראשיכם שבטיכם זקניכם ושוטריכם כל איש ישראל. טפכם נשיכם וגרך אשר בקרב מחניך מחטב עציך עד שואב מימיך כדי שידעו עבדים ושפחות פסקי המצות מה לעשות ומה שלא לעשות אבל לא יתכן לבחור ללמוד לבנות ואפילו האב עומד שם ושומר פן יתייחד לא יתכן פן יתגבר יצרו עליה או יצרה עליו וקול באשה ערוה אלא האב ילמוד בתו ואשתו והשונמית הולכת ושומעת הדרשה מפי אלישע שהרי אמר מדוע את הולכת אליו היום לא חדש ולא שבת מכלל דבחדש ושבת הולכת:

Source 11 · Rishonim
Verified

Mishneh Torah, Foundations of the Torah 4:13

משנה תורה, יסודי התורה יד יא והלאה

Mishneh Torah, Foundations of the Torah 4:13

The passage states that it is possible for all people—small and great, male and female, those with broad understanding and those with limited understanding—to know these matters.

וְאֶפְשָׁר שֶׁיְּדָעֵם הַכּל קָטָן וְגָדוֹל אִישׁ וְאִשָּׁה בַּעַל לֵב רָחָב וּבַעַל לֵב קָצָר: וְאֶפְשָׁר שֶׁיְּדָעֵם הַכּל קָטָן וְגָדוֹל אִישׁ וְאִשָּׁה בַּעַל לֵב רָחָב וּבַעַל לֵב קָצָר:

See also

Source 12 · Rishonim
Verified

Rambam on Mishnah Sotah 3:4

רמב"ם על משנה סוטה ג׳:ד׳

Rambam on Mishnah Sotah 3:4

Explains the Mishnah's positions about teaching Torah to women and the rationale behind Rabbi Eliezer's warning, while acknowledging the distinct question of women studying voluntarily.

מה שאמר אין מספקת לשתות וכו' הוא דברי ר"ע לפי שהוא סובר ג"כ מקריב מנחתה ואח"כ משקה כמו שאומר ר"ש ואינה הלכה ומה שאמר יש לה זכות ר"ל זכות תורה ואע"פ שהיא אינה מצווה בכך לפי שאין מצות ת"ת אלא על האנשים שנאמר ולמדתם אותם את בניכם בניכם ולא בנותיכם.

Source 13 · Rishonim
Verified

Sefer HaChinukh 419

ספר החינוך תי״ט — ד"ה וְנוֹהֶגֶת מִצְוָה זוֹ בְּכָל מָקוֹם וּבְכָל

Sefer HaChinukh 419:7

Discusses the commandment of Torah study and its educational scope, including the traditional derivation that the formal obligation to teach is directed toward sons.

וְנוֹהֶגֶת מִצְוָה זוֹ בְּכָל מָקוֹם וּבְכָל זְמַן בִּזְכָרִים אֲבָל לֹא בִּנְקֵבוֹת, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (דברים יא יט) בְּנֵיכֶם. וְדָרְשׁוּ זִכְרוֹנָם לִבְרָכָה (קדושין כט, ב) וְלֹא בְּנוֹתֵיכֶם. וְכֵן אִשָּׁה אֵינָהּ חַיֶּבֶת לְלַמֵּד אֶת בְּנָהּ, דְּכָל שֶׁאֵינוֹ בְּחִיּוּב לִלְמֹד אֵינוֹ בְּחִיּוּב לְלַמֵּד. אֲבָל מִכָּל מָקוֹם רָאוּי לְכָל אִשָּׁה לְהִשְׁתַּדֵּל שֶׁלֹּא יְהוּ בָּנֶיהָ עַמֵּי הָאָרֶץ, אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁאֵינָהּ מְצֻוָּה מִדִּין הַתּוֹרָה, וְשָׂכָר טוֹב יֵשׁ לָהּ בַּעֲמָלָהּ (עפ"י סוטה כא א). וְגַם הָאִשָּׁה שֶׁלָּמְדָה תּוֹרָה שָׂכָר יֵשׁ לָהּ, וְאַף עַל פִּי כֵן צִוּוּ חֲכָמִים (סוטה כ א) שֶׁלֹּא יְלַמֵּד אָדָם לְבִתּוֹ תּוֹרָה, לְפִי שֶׁדַּעַת הַנָּשִׁים קַלָּה, וּמוֹצִיאִין דִּבְרֵי תּוֹרָה לְדִבְרֵי הֲבַאי בַּעֲנִיּוּת דַּעְתָּן. וְהָעוֹבֵר עַל זֶה וְלֹא לִמֵּד אֶת בְּנוֹ תּוֹרָה עַד שֶׁיֵּדַע לִקְרוֹת בְּסֵפֶר תּוֹרָה וְיָבִין פֵּרוּשׁ הַכְּתוּבִים כִּפְשָׁטָן בִּטֵּל עֲשֵׂה זֶה, וְכֵן כָּל מִי שֶׁיֵּשׁ סִפֵּק בְּיָדוֹ לִלְמֹד בְּשׁוּם צַד הוּא בִּכְלַל עֲשֵׂה זֶה, וְעָנְשׁוֹ גָּדוֹל מְאֹד אִם לֹא יְקַיְּמֶנּוּ, כִּי הַמִּצְוָה הַזֹּאת הִיא אֵם לְכֻלָּן.

And this commandment is practiced in every place and at all times by males, but not by females, since it is stated (Deutoronomy 1:19), “your sons” — and they, may their memory be blessed, expounded (Kiddushin 29b), “But not your daughters.” And so [too,] a woman is not obligated to teach her son, as anyone who [does not have] the obligation to study, [does not have] the obligation to teach. But even though she is not commanded by Torah writ, nonetheless it is fitting for every woman to make efforts that her sons should not be ignoramuses, and she has good reward [for this] in general (based on Sotah 21a). And there is also reward for a woman who studies Torah. But nonetheless, the Sages commanded (Sotah 20a) that a man not teach his daughter Torah, because the mind of women is weak, and they turn words of Torah into words of nonsense through the poverty of their minds. And one who transgresses it and does not teach his son Torah — until he knows how to read in the Scroll of the Torah and understand the simple understanding of the verses — has violated this positive commandment. And anyone who has the wherewithal in his hand to study in any way is included in this positive commandment. And if he does not fulfill it, his punishment is very great, as this commandment is the mother of them all.

Source 14 · Rishonim
Verified

Ibn Ezra on Proverbs 1:8

אבן עזרא על משלי א׳:ח׳

Ibn Ezra on Proverbs 1:8

A woman who is wise instructs her son in the proper way, as exemplified by Bathsheba who disciplined Lemuel, using language of persuasion drawn from the responses and statements in that passage.

שמע בני מוסר וגו', תורת אמך - כי האשה חכמה מורה הדרך הישרה לבנה, כבת שבע שהיא יסרה למואל ומלת אל לשון פיוס, מן המענה ומהם אלקום עמו אל מות.

Source 15 · Acharonim
Verified

Shulchan Arukh, Yoreh De'ah

שולחן ערוך, יורה דעה רמ״ו — ד"ה אשה שלמדה תורה יש לה שכר

Shulchan Arukh, Yoreh De'ah 246:6

Rules that women are obligated to learn the laws relevant to them, but are not generally obligated in the full study of Torah; it also records the standard distinction regarding teaching Torah to one's daughter.

אשה שלמדה תורה יש לה שכר אבל לא כשכר האיש מפני שאינה מצווה ועושה ואע"פ שיש לה שכר צוו חז"ל שלא ילמד אדם את בתו תורה מפני שרוב הנשים אין דעתן מכוונת להתלמד ומוציאות דברי תורה לדברי הבאי לפי עניות דעתן אמרו חכמים כל המלמד את בתו תורה כאילו מלמדה תיפלות (פי' דבר עבירה) בד"א תורה שבע"פ אבל תורה שבכתב לא ילמד אותה לכתחלה ואם מלמדה אינו כמלמד' תיפלות (רמב"ם וסמ"ג ולא כמקצת ספרי הטור) : הגה ומ"מ חייבת האשה ללמוד דינים השייכים לאשה (אגור בשם סמ"ג) ואשה אינה חייבת ללמד את בנה תורה ומ"מ אם עוזרת לבנה או לבעלה שיעסקו בתורה חולקת שכר בהדייהו (הגהות מיי' פ"א דת"ת וסמ"ג):

A woman who studied Torah receives a reward, but not like that of a man, because she is not obligated yet performs the commandment. And even though she earns a reward, our rabbis have commanded that one should not teach his daughter Torah, because the majority of women are not intellectual prepared to be taught, and remove words of Torah to words of emptiness due to their intellectual limitations. The rabbis said: One who teaches his daughter Torah is as if he taught her frivolity. When is this stated? In regard to the oral Torah. However, in regard to the written Torah one should preferably not teach her, but if he did so it is not comparable to frivolity. Rema: Nonetheless, a woman is obligated to study laws that are relevant to her. And a woman is not obligated to teach her son Torah. Nonetheless, if she assists her son or husband to study Torah, she receives reward along with them.

See also

Source 16 · Acharonim
Verified

Arukh HaShulchan, Yoreh De'ah 246:8-11

ערוך השולחן, יורה דעה רמ״ו:ח׳-י״א

Arukh HaShulchan, Yoreh De'ah 246:8-11

Reviews the traditional restriction concerning teaching Torah to women, the scope of women’s obligation to learn practical law, and the boundaries of voluntary study.

לעולם ילמוד אדם תורה ואחר כך ישא אשה. שאם ישא אשה תחילה – אי אפשר לו לעסוק בתורה מאחר שריחים בצוארו, שיהיה מוכרח לחפש אחר פרנסה. ויהדר שיקח בת איש אמיד וירא אלקים, שיעזור לו שתהא ביכולתו לשבת איזה שנים על התורה.

Source 17 · Acharonim
Verified

Beit Yosef, Yoreh De'ah 246

בית יוסף, יורה דעה רמ״ו — ד"ה כתב הרמב"ם ז"ל אשה שלמדה תורה

Beit Yosef, Yoreh De'ah 246:12

Collects and evaluates the earlier sources concerning women's Torah study and the teaching of Torah she-be'al peh, providing the background for the later codified ruling.

כתב הרמב"ם ז"ל אשה שלמדה תורה יש לה שכר אבל לא כשכר האיש וכו' עד אינו אלא כמלמדה תפלות בפ"ב מהל' ת"ת. ומ"ש יש לה שכר אבל לא כשכר האיש בפ' היה נוטל (סוטה כא:) אהא דתנן אם יש זכות תולה לה אמרינן בגמרא זכות דמאי אילימא זכות דתורה הא אינה מצווה ועושה היא ופירש"י דכיון דאינה מצוה אין שכרה גדול כמצווה ועושה. ומ"ש וכל העושה דבר שאינו מצווה עליו אין שכרו כשכר המצווה ועושה מימרא דר' חנינא בפ"ק דקידושין [לא.] ובריש ע"ז [דף ג.] וכתבו התוס' שהטעם מפני שהמצווה דואג תמיד לבטל יצרו ולקיים מצות בוראו: ומ"ש ואע"פ שיש לה שכר צוו חכמים שלא ילמד אדם את בתו תורה וכו' במתני' פרק היה נוטל (סוטה כ.) פלוגתא דבן עזאי ור' אליעזר ופסק כרבי אליעזר: ומ"ש בד"א בתורה שבכתב אבל בתורה שבע"פ וכו' טעות סופר יש כאן כי בספרי הרמב"ם כתוב בהיפך בד"א בתורה שבעל פה אבל בתורה שבכתב וכו' וכן מוכיחים הדברים פ"ד מהל' ת"ת להרמב"ם אין מלמדין תורה אלא לתלמיד הגון וכו' עד וקדושת בית המדרש חמורה מקדושת בית הכנסת הכל בפ"ד:

Source 18 · Acharonim
Verified

recovered from “Magen Avraham 47:14

Magen Avraham Orach Chayim

מגן אברהם מ״ז

Magen Avraham 47

Discusses women's relationship to Torah-study blessings and the scope of their study obligation, a key locus for distinguishing permitted study from formal obligation.

נשים וכו'. דהא חייבות ללמוד דינין שלהם כמ"ש בי"ד סימן רמ"ו ס"ו ועוד דחייבות לומר פ' הקרבנות כמו שחייבות בתפלה וא"כ קאי הברכה ע"ז [ב"י בשם אגור] עמ"ש סי' קע"ז ס"ג:

Source 19 · Modern
External

Igros Moshe YD 3:87

אגרות משה, יו"ד ג׳:פ״ז

Igros Moshe YD 3:87

The author rules that girls should not be taught Mishnayos, as the Sages forbade teaching Oral Torah to women and it is considered equivalent to teaching them impropriety, except for Pirkei Avot, which may be taught because it concerns ethics and proper conduct.

עכ"פ משניות שהוא תורה שבע"פ צוו חכמים שלא ילמדוה והוא כאילו למדום תפלות, ולכן צריך למנוע מזה ורק פרקי אבות משום שהוא עניני מוסר והנהגות טובות יש ללמדם

On this pageThe author rules that girls in schools like Bais Yaakov should not be taught Mishnayos, as teaching Oral Torah to women is forbidden by the Sages and likened to teaching them impropriety (tiflus). An exception is made for Pirkei Avot, which consists of ethics and character development to inspire a love of Torah, but other tractates of Mishnah must not be taught.

Igros Moshe YD 3:87 — page scan on HebrewBooks
Page 332

Igros Moshe is not freely available in text. This PDF surfaced in our research. Please use the feedback buttons below to help us improve.

Source 20 · Modern
External

בדין לימור תורה לנשים

ציץ אליעזר, ח״י סי׳ ט׳

Tzitz Eliezer 10:9

The author examines the halakhic parameters for teaching Torah to women, analyzing Shulchan Aruch HaRav's position on whether there exists a de facto prohibition against teaching women the Written Torah and comparing the reasoning of Rashi and the Rambam on this matter.

סימן ט בדין לימוד תורה לנשים ב״ה. מוצש״ק אור ליום א׳ כ״א אד״ב תשכ״ז.

On this pageIn this responsum, the author addresses the halakhic parameters of teaching Torah to women. Corresponding with Rabbi Moshe Dov Wollner, he analyzes the view of Shulchan Aruch HaRav regarding whether there is a de facto prohibition against teaching women the Written Torah, comparing the underlying reasoning of Rashi and the Rambam.

Tzitz Eliezer 10:9 — page scan on HebrewBooks
Page 73

Tzitz Eliezer is not freely available in text. This PDF surfaced in our research. Please use the feedback buttons below to help us improve.

Source 21 · Modern
External

Tzitz Eliezer 10:8

ציץ אליעזר, ח״י סי׳ ח׳

Tzitz Eliezer 10:8

The author rejects stringent restrictions on Torah education for girls based on menstrual-related prohibitions, and defends leading authorities' establishment of schools teaching Torah to women as necessary to preserve faith in modern times, while arguing that women's refraining from prayer and blessings during menstruation under the guise of stringency is improper since women are fundamentally obligated in these practices.

נשים בתפלה והזכרת דברים שבקדושה בימי נדותן ולימוד תורה להן

On this pageThis siman begins a discussion regarding whether women may pray, mention holy matters, or study Torah (both Written and Oral Law) during their menstrual period (niddah). The author introduces the topic by acknowledging a letter from a rabbi commenting on his previous analysis of this issue in Volume 9. The author rejects a strict approach that seeks to forbid all Torah education for girls nowadays based on stringencies regarding menstruation or classical prohibitions. He defends the decisions of recent leading Torah authorities who permitted and established schools to teach girls Torah, arguing that their rulings were necessary to preserve the faith in modern times. The passage discusses the custom of women refraining from praying, reciting blessings, or entering the synagogue during their menstruation (niddah). Citing major authorities such as the Shulchan Aruch Harav, the Pri Chadash, and the Pele Yoetz, the author argues that since women are fundamentally obligated in these prayers and blessings, refraining from them under the guise of stringency (chumrah) is improper and leads to neglecting actual obligations.

Tzitz Eliezer 10:8 — page scan on HebrewBooks
Page 70

Tzitz Eliezer is not freely available in text. This PDF surfaced in our research. Please use the feedback buttons below to help us improve.

Source 22 · Modern
Verified

recovered from “She'arim Metzuyanim BeHalakhah Yoreh De'ah 246

B'Mareh HaBazak Volume VII

שו"ת במראה הבזק חלק שביעי ע״א:ד׳

B'Mareh HaBazak Volume VII 71:4

The passage raises a question about whether it is permitted to teach Oral Torah (Mishnah) to women in our time, and asks what the position of halachic authorities is regarding women's Torah study today.

הן אינן משוכנעות שמותר להן ללמד משנה לבנות, לכן הועלתה השאלה המתייחסת להוראת תורה שבעל-פה לנשים בדורנו. באופן כללי, מהי עמדת הפוסקים לגבי היחס לנשים וללימוד תורה בימינו? מה מן התורה מותר ללמד לבת בדורנו?

Source 23 · Modern
External

לימוד תורה בנשים

רבבות אפרים, ח״ח סי׳ רצ״ו

Revavos Ephraim 8:296

The passage distinguishes between Torah study as an intrinsic commandment (from which women are exempt) and Torah study undertaken to learn how to properly observe commandments (which obligates women equally).

יש סוג שני במצות לימוד התורה דהיינו ללמוד בכדי לדעת איך לקיים המצוות, ולדעת איך לקיים המצוות גם נשים מחוייבות ללמוד

On this pageThe passage discusses the scope of women's obligation to study Torah, addressing a tension between the Sefer ha-Chinuch (who exempts women from writing a Torah scroll due to their general exemption from Torah study) and the Rama (who rules that women must learn the practical laws relevant to them). The author resolves this by distinguishing between two types of study: the intrinsic commandment of Torah study for its own sake (from which women are exempt), and functional learning required to properly observe commandments (which women are obligated to do).

Revavos Ephraim 8:296 — page scan on HebrewBooks
Page 191

Revavos Ephraim is not freely available in text. This PDF surfaced in our research. Please use the feedback buttons below to help us improve.

Source 24 · Modern
External

Tzitz Eliezer 9:3

ציץ אליעזר, ח״ט סי׳ ג׳

Tzitz Eliezer 9:3

The Tosefta permits women to read Torah using the language "they are permitted to read," which indicates that women may study on their own initiative rather than being actively taught by others.

בתוספתא לא כתוב שמלמדין אותן לקרות בתורה וכו׳, אלא כתוב בלשון ״ומותרין לקרות׳׳, והיינו מעצמן

On this pageThe author addresses the prohibition against teaching Torah to women, resolving an apparent contradiction in the Tosefta which permits women to read Torah, Mishnah, and Halachot. He explains that either the Tosefta follows the minority opinion of Ben Azzai, or that it refers to women studying on their own initiative (which is permitted and rewarded), as opposed to being actively taught by others. The author analyzes the scope of a woman's permission and obligation to study Torah, discussing whether the prohibition against teaching women Torah applies to self-study, and distinguishing between Torah Shebichtav (which is permitted) and Torah Shebe'al Peh. He connects this to the ruling that women recite Birkat HaTorah, explaining that they are obligated in blessings because they must learn the practical halachot that apply to them. The author analyzes the permissibility of teaching Torah to women, concluding that teaching them the Written Torah is permitted l'chatchilah according to many authorities. He emphasizes that women are fully obligated to learn practical halachot and mitzvot (such as the laws of Shabbat) so they can properly observe them, whereas the traditional prohibition against teaching them Torah applies only to deep Talmudic analysis and the inner secrets of the commandments. The passage outlines the halachic parameters of Torah study for women, particularly in the modern era. Citing the Chafetz Chaim, it explains that teaching girls Tanakh and ethical teachings (mussar) is highly commendable nowadays to preserve their faith against external influences. It further clarifies that while women are not commanded in Torah study—and thus do not receive the intrinsic spiritual reward associated with the mitzvah itself—they do receive reward for any study that enables practical halachic observance.

Tzitz Eliezer 9:3 — page scan on HebrewBooks
Page 42

Tzitz Eliezer is not freely available in text. This PDF surfaced in our research. Please use the feedback buttons below to help us improve.

Related sources· 8 found, not yet verifiedSign in to verify
  • כה תאמר לבית יעקב... דבר אחר למה לנשים תחילה, שהן מזדרזות במצוות.

    from our library copy — not yet checked against the original

  • ברם הכא הדבר מסור לנשים, והנשים עצילות הן.

    from our library copy — not yet checked against the original

  • Berakhot 48bunverified

    לפי שהנשים דברניות הן.

    from our library copy — not yet checked against the original

  • שאלו את רבי יהושע מהו שילמד אדם את בנו יוונית, אמר להם ילמדנו בשעה שאינה לא יום ולא לילה, כדכתיב והגית בו יומם ולילה, והתני רבי ישמעאל ובחרת בחיים זו אומנות, מעתה אסור לאדם ללמד את בנו אומנות, בגין דכתיב והגית בו יומם ולילה. רבי בריה דרבי חייא בר ווא בשם רבי יוחנן מפני המסורות, רבי אבהו בשם רבי יוחנן מותר לאדם ללמד את בתו יוונית, מפני שהוא תכשיט לה, שמע שמעון אמר בגין דו בעי מלפה בנתי הוא תליה ליה ברבי יוחנן, יבא עלי אם שמעתי מרבי יוחנן.

    from our library copy — not yet checked against the original

  • Chagigah 3aunverified

    ...למימרא דכי לא משתמעי לא גמר, והא הנהו תרי אילמי דהוו בשבבותיה דרבי, בני ברתיה דרבי יוחנן בן גודגדא, ואמרי לה בני אחתיה דרבי יוחנן, דכל אימת דהוה עייל רבי לבי מדרשא הוו עיילי ויתבי קמייהו ומיידי ברישייהו ומרחישן שפוותייהו, ובעי רבי רחמי עלייהו ואיתסו, ואשתכח דהוו גמירי הלכתא וספרא וספרי וכולה הש"ס... שבת של מי היתה, של רבי אלעזר בן עזריה היתה, ובמה היתה הגדה היום, אמרו לו בפרשת הקהל, ומה דרש בה, הקהל את העם האנשים והנשים והטף, ואם אנשים באים ללמד נשים באות לשמע...

    from our library copy — not yet checked against the original

Related sheets

Halachaהלכה

Teaching Daughters Gemara and Torah

Sources explore the halakhic status of a father teaching his daughter Talmud and other Torah texts. The classical sources present a dispute between those who obligate such teaching and those who discourage it, along with distinctions between different categories of Torah study and their applicability to women.

View Sources18 sources
Machshavaמחשבה

Joy in Torah Study and Divine Service

Sources across Jewish tradition emphasize that joyful engagement is essential to proper Torah learning and worship of God. The teachings range from biblical and rabbinic foundations to medieval philosophical and Hasidic perspectives, presenting joy as both a spiritual prerequisite and a transformative force in religious practice.

View Sources25 sources
Halachaהלכה

Gambling and Card Games in Jewish Law

Jewish law forbids gambling and games of chance for money, treating them as a form of theft (gezel) or at minimum as engagement in frivolous pursuits unworthy of a person's time. The sources establish that gamblers are disqualified from serving as legal witnesses and explain the underlying concerns about the legitimacy of wagers and the spiritual damage caused by such activities.

View Sources10 sources
Halachaהלכה

Interrupting Shema for Fear and Honor

These sources examine the halakhic rules governing when one may interrupt the recitation of Shema to greet another person. The sources distinguish between interruptions motivated by honor (greeting a dignified person) and those motivated by fear (greeting someone one is afraid of), and clarify which parts of Shema permit such interruptions and which do not.

View Sources19 sources
Chassidusחסידות

Chassidic Principles in Classical Jewish Sources

These sources demonstrate that core Chassidic teachings—spiritual ascent, self-nullification before God, joyful service, and intentional prayer—are grounded in Torah, Talmud, and earlier Jewish tradition rather than being novel innovations. The sources show how Chassidus synthesizes and deepens classical Jewish thought.

View Sources7 sources
Chassidusחסידות

Chabad on the Spiritual Significance of Eretz Yisrael

Chabad teachings explore Eretz Yisrael as a land of unique spiritual sanctity, where Divine Providence operates directly and the Shekhinah dwells most powerfully. The sources present physical residence in the Land as corresponding to an inner spiritual ascent and the ultimate purpose of creation.

View Sources5 sources

Explore more