parshaמפרשי הפרשה

אלשיך — רב לכם בני לוי

Moshe's reproof closes with 'רב לכם בני לוי' — addressed to the Leviim. But 250 of the rebels were not Leviim; they were yisraelim (וכל עדתו, נשיאי עדה). Why does Moshe direct the appeal only to the Leviim, who were a tiny minority of the rebellion?

והנה היותר קרוב בדעת משה הוא שיענו ויאמרו, מה לנו ליקח מחתות וישראלים אנו, יקחום אהרן וקרח. אך ראה כי הודו בדבר לקחת להם מחתות. אז הפך משה פניו אל בני לוי ואמר 'רב לכם בני לוי'. כלומר, הנה דבר רב וגדול היה זה לכם בני לוי, לעלות על לבכם מלויה לכהונה גדולה ולדלג מדרגה אחת. כל שכן הטפשים האלה, כי הוא פלא איך עלה בדעתם לעלות שלשה מדרגות כאחת, מהיותם ישראלים עד כהונה גדולה.

1 source · all verified

Opens as a working sheet — explore, annotate, and export.

Source 1 · Acharonim
Verified

אלשיך

Alshekh on Torah, Numbers 16:6

Q — Moshe's reproof closes with 'רב לכם בני לוי' — addressed to the Leviim. But 250 of the rebels were not Leviim; they were yisraelim (וכל עדתו, נשיאי עדה). Why does Moshe direct the appeal only to the Leviim, who were a tiny minority of the rebellion?

A — Moshe had expected the yisraelim, when offered the ketoret test, to refuse — to admit it was absurd for a yisrael to claim the kehunah gedolah, and to leave the test to Korach (a Levi) versus Aharon. When they all agreed to take pans, Moshe understood the case was hopeless. A person whose ego has scaled three rungs at once — from yisrael to kehunah gedolah — is beyond reasoning with. Moshe therefore turned his words to the only group still in range of argument — the Leviim, whose leap was 'only' from Leviyah to Kehunah Gedolah, one rung. He doesn't even address 'הטפשים האלה' anymore; with the deeply-deluded, words don't work.

והנה היותר קרוב בדעת משה הוא שיענו ויאמרו, מה לנו ליקח מחתות וישראלים אנו, יקחום אהרן וקרח. אך ראה כי הודו בדבר לקחת להם מחתות. אז הפך משה פניו אל בני לוי ואמר 'רב לכם בני לוי'. כלומר, הנה דבר רב וגדול היה זה לכם בני לוי, לעלות על לבכם מלויה לכהונה גדולה ולדלג מדרגה אחת. כל שכן הטפשים האלה, כי הוא פלא איך עלה בדעתם לעלות שלשה מדרגות כאחת, מהיותם ישראלים עד כהונה גדולה.

Related sheets

Machshavaמחשבה

Halacha and Kabbalah in Tension

These sources examine the relationship between Jewish legal tradition and mystical interpretation, establishing frameworks for evaluating claims based on esoteric knowledge against the binding authority of halakhic precedent. The texts address how mystical symbolism and inner intention interact with concrete legal obligation.

View Sources31 sources
Tanakhתנ״ך

The Motivations Behind Korach's Rebellion

Korach

Sources examine why Korach challenged Moses and Aaron's leadership, tracing his motivations to jealousy, ambition for power and priestly status, and a dispute rooted in personal rather than spiritual concerns. Biblical and rabbinic sources analyze both the immediate grievances and the deeper spiritual failures underlying this pivotal rebellion.

View Sources26 sources
Chassidusחסידות

Toras Shalom of the Rashab on Yud Tes Kislev

Sources exploring the spiritual dimensions of Yud Tes Kislev and the revelation of inner Torah teachings, including foundational Chabad themes on divine unity and the purpose of creation in the lower worlds.

View Sources19 sources
Halachaהלכה

Worker Withdrawal and Employer Remedies in Halacha

Jewish law permits a laborer to withdraw from employment mid-job because he serves God, not man, but this right is limited when the work involves a time-sensitive loss (davar ha'aved). The sources explore how employers may recover damages through wage deduction and replacement-cost recovery, and when the principle of irreplaceable loss overrides the worker's freedom to retract.

View Sources17 sources
Mitzvotמצוות

Salt as the Covenant of Endurance

Sources explore salt's symbolic and practical role in sacrificial offerings as a sign of an eternal, unchanging covenant between God and Israel. The commentaries connect the requirement to salt all offerings with the deeper theological meaning of salt as a substance that preserves and endures across time.

View Sources16 sources
Halachaהלכה

The Paradox of the First Pure Person in Parah Adumah

Sources address the logical paradox of how the initial person required to handle the ashes of the red heifer can achieve purity when the parah adumah itself is needed to purify those who are impure. Classical sources present this as a divine decree (chok) that transcends human reasoning.

View Sources16 sources

Explore more