parshaמפרשי הפרשה

רמב"ן — ויקצף משה / הן הנה היו לבני ישראל בדבר בלעם

Moshe rages at the officers who returned from Midian with women alive. But he never said 'kill the women' — just 'to take Hashem's vengeance.' Why be angry at compliance?

והנה משה לא צוה אותם מה יעשו, רק אמר להם 'לתת נקמת ה' במדין', וחשב שלא ישאירו בהם שריד ופליט כנקמת עמלק או כנקמת שבעה עממים. וכאשר ראה שהשאירו הנשים והטף והבהמה, קצף על הנשים היודעות משכב זכר, כי ראוי לפקודי החיל להורגן תחלת כל דבר, גם לנקמה גם לדין התורה 'ואת הבהמה תהרוגו'.

1 source · all verified

Opens as a working sheet — explore, annotate, and export.

Source 1 · Rishonim
Verified

רמב"ן

רמב"ן על במדבר ל״א:ב׳

Ramban on Numbers 31:2

Q — Moshe rages at the officers who returned from Midian with women alive. But he never said 'kill the women' — just 'to take Hashem's vengeance.' Why be angry at compliance?

A — Ramban: Moshe expected the officers to exercise judgment, not literalism. They should have inferred two things. (1) Moral-historical: 'הן הנה היו לבני ישראל בדבר בלעם' — these very women caused the magefa at Peor. Vengeance on Midian without killing the women who actually caused the deaths is no vengeance at all. (2) Halachic kal va'chomer: 'ואת הבהמה תהרוגו' — Torah law mandates killing an animal that caused a person to sin; surely a fortiori the human women who deliberately seduced the camp. Officers who carry out an order to the letter while ignoring its evident moral and halachic logic fail their commander. The chiddush, framed beautifully with the adjacent parsha (Nedarim): both 'I wasn't told' (the officers) and 'I was told' (the wife relying on her husband's wrongly-permitted vow) are unacceptable excuses. Judgment is required either way.

והנה משה לא צוה אותם מה יעשו, רק אמר להם 'לתת נקמת ה' במדין', וחשב שלא ישאירו בהם שריד ופליט כנקמת עמלק או כנקמת שבעה עממים. וכאשר ראה שהשאירו הנשים והטף והבהמה, קצף על הנשים היודעות משכב זכר, כי ראוי לפקודי החיל להורגן תחלת כל דבר, גם לנקמה גם לדין התורה 'ואת הבהמה תהרוגו'.

Related sheets

Halachaהלכה

Intention and Vain Blessings in Hearing

This collection examines whether one may listen to a blessing without intention, whether such listening constitutes fulfillment of an obligation, and the halakhic status of hearing a vain blessing. The sources address the relationship between the speaker's intention, the listener's intention, and the validity of fulfilling obligations through hearing.

View Sources24 sources
Halachaהלכה

Immersion of China Dishes in Jewish Law

Sources address whether china dishes require ritual immersion (tevila) when purchased from non-Jews, how they are classified relative to glass and metal vessels, and whether a blessing is recited during the process. The halacha derives from biblical precedent and rabbinic elaboration on purifying vessels.

View Sources17 sources
Halachaהלכה

Marit Ayin: The Appearance of Impropriety

These sources explore marit ayin (the appearance of wrongdoing), a foundational rabbinic principle requiring Jews to avoid actions that might create suspicion of transgression, even when technically permitted. The sources range from Talmudic discussions of idolatry and Shabbat observance to practical rulings on kashrut, grounded in the biblical imperative to be 'clean before God and before Israel.'

View Sources14 sources
Mitzvotמצוות

Commandments in Parshat Pinchas

Pinchas

Parshat Pinchas contains several major mitzvot, including laws of inheritance (particularly the daughters of Zelophehad's case), daily and additional sacrificial offerings, and the festival sacrifices. These sources examine both the practical halakhic requirements and their spiritual significance across rabbinic and medieval Jewish tradition.

View Sources12 sources
Halachaהלכה

Tevilah Requirements for Metal Vessels

Sources discuss which metal vessels purchased from non-Jews require immersion in a mikveh before use. The foundational Talmudic passage derives this obligation from the Midian narrative, while later codes specify the types of metals and vessels covered by the requirement.

View Sources11 sources
Tanakhתנ״ך

The Fate of the Ten Lost Tribes

These sources trace the biblical account of the Assyrian exile of the northern Israelite tribes and explore rabbinic, medieval, and mystical perspectives on their current whereabouts and future restoration. They range from historical accounts of deportation to theological debates about whether the tribes will ever return.

View Sources10 sources

Explore more