Halachaהלכה

Artificial Insemination in Jewish Law

These sources address the halakhic principles governing reproduction, fertility, and the prohibition against wasting seed, which form the foundational framework for evaluating assisted reproductive technologies in Jewish law. The sources span biblical narrative, Talmudic discussion, and codified rulings on procreation and marital obligations.

אָסוּר לְהַפְסִיד אֵיבְרֵי זֶרַע

13 sources · 11 verified

Opens as a working sheet — explore, annotate, and export.

What the sources say

The foundation of the entire discussion is the gravity of the obligation to procreate: Mishnah Yevamot 6:6 rules that a man may not cease from fulfilling the mitzvah of procreation unless he already has children, and the Shulchan Arukh (Even HaEzer 1) reinforces this by ruling that whoever does not engage in procreation is as though he sheds blood, diminishes the Divine image, and causes the Shekhinah to depart from Israel — establishing why poskim treat infertility as a pressing halachic problem demanding a solution.

Against that imperative stands a countervailing prohibition: Mishneh Torah, Forbidden Intercourse 16:10 rules that it is forbidden to destroy the reproductive organs in any human being or animal, and the Kli Yakar (Shemot 20:9) draws on the Gemara's equation of wasting seed with both adultery and bloodshed — reading the pasuk in Yeshayahu 'your hands are full of blood' as referring to those who emit seed in vain — framing the prohibition as one with a dimension of murder.

The Arukh HaShulchan (Even HaEzer 25) rules that even though a man may technically engage with his wife in any manner he wishes while she is ritually pure, a God-fearing person should conduct himself only in the manner appropriate for seed to be sown and children to be produced, because it is nearly impossible to be scrupulous against wasting seed otherwise — a ruling that directly shapes how any non-standard method of insemination must be evaluated.

The biblical precedents of Sarai directing Avram to father children through Hagar (Bereishit 16:1–4) and Rachel directing Jacob to Bilhah so that she might 'be built up through her' (Bereishit 30:1–3) are the earliest textual instances of procreation arranged outside the standard marital act, providing the aggadic backdrop against which later authorities discuss third-party involvement in conception.

Source 1 · Tanach
Verified

Genesis 16:1-4

בראשית ט״ז:א׳-ד׳

Genesis 16:1-4

Sarah and Hagar provide an early biblical model of a wife giving her maidservant to bear children, often invoked in discussions of alternative family formation and reproduction.

וַתֹּ֨אמֶר שָׂרַ֜י אֶל־אַבְרָ֗ם הִנֵּה־נָ֞א עֲצָרַ֤נִי יְהֹוָה֙ מִלֶּ֔דֶת בֹּא־נָא֙ אֶל־שִׁפְחָתִ֔י אוּלַ֥י אִבָּנֶ֖ה מִמֶּ֑נָּה וַיִּשְׁמַ֥ע אַבְרָ֖ם לְק֥וֹל שָׂרָֽי׃ וַתִּקַּ֞ח שָׂרַ֣י אֵֽשֶׁת־אַבְרָ֗ם אֶת־הָגָ֤ר הַמִּצְרִית֙ שִׁפְחָתָ֔הּ מִקֵּץ֙ עֶ֣שֶׂר שָׁנִ֔ים לְשֶׁ֥בֶת אַבְרָ֖ם בְּאֶ֣רֶץ כְּנָ֑עַן וַתִּתֵּ֥ן אֹתָ֛הּ לְאַבְרָ֥ם אִישָׁ֖הּ ל֥וֹ לְאִשָּֽׁה׃

And Sarai said to Abram, “Look, GOD has kept me from bearing. Consort with my maid; perhaps I shall have a child through her.” And Abram heeded Sarai’s request. So Sarai, Abram’s wife, took her maid, Hagar the Egyptian—after Abram had dwelt in the land of Canaan ten years—and gave her to her husband Abram as concubine.

Source 2 · Tanach
Verified

Genesis 30:1-3

בראשית ל׳:א׳-ג׳

Genesis 30:1-3

Rachel’s struggle with infertility and the use of Bilhah as a surrogate-like solution is a classic biblical starting point for later discussions of reproductive assistance.

וַתֵּ֣רֶא רָחֵ֗ל כִּ֣י לֹ֤א יָֽלְדָה֙ לְיַעֲקֹ֔ב וַתְּקַנֵּ֥א רָחֵ֖ל בַּאֲחֹתָ֑הּ וַתֹּ֤אמֶר אֶֽל־יַעֲקֹב֙ הָֽבָה־לִּ֣י בָנִ֔ים וְאִם־אַ֖יִן מֵתָ֥ה אָנֹֽכִי׃ וַתֹּ֕אמֶר הִנֵּ֛ה אֲמָתִ֥י בִלְהָ֖ה בֹּ֣א אֵלֶ֑יהָ וְתֵלֵד֙ עַל־בִּרְכַּ֔י וְאִבָּנֶ֥ה גַם־אָנֹכִ֖י מִמֶּֽנָּה׃

When Rachel saw that she had borne Jacob no children, she became envious of her sister; and Rachel said to Jacob, “Give me children, or I shall die.” She said, “Here is my maid Bilhah. Consort with her, that she may bear on my knees and that through her I too may have children.”

Source 3 · Chazal
Verified

Mishnah Yevamot 6:6

משנה יבמות ו׳:ו׳

Mishnah Yevamot 6:6

The Mishnah discusses the command to be fruitful and multiply in the context of marriage and family obligations, providing a basic halakhic backdrop for reproductive questions.

לֹא יִבָּטֵל אָדָם מִפְּרִיָּה וּרְבִיָּה, אֶלָּא אִם כֵּן יֶשׁ לוֹ בָנִים. הָאִישׁ מְצֻוֶּה עַל פְּרִיָּה וּרְבִיָּה, אֲבָל לֹא הָאִשָּׁה.

Source 4 · Chazal
Verified

Berakhot 10a

ברכות י׳ א — ד"ה אֲמַר לֵיהּ

Berakhot 10a:28

Isaiah tells Hezekiah that he must fulfill the mitzvah of procreation as commanded, regardless of his foreknowledge about his descendants' character, and should not presume to make decisions based on divine secrets.

אֲמַר לֵיהּ: מַאי כּוּלֵּי הַאי? אֲמַר לֵיהּ: מִשּׁוּם דְּלָא עֲסַקְתְּ בִּפְרִיָּה וּרְבִיָּה. אֲמַר לֵיהּ: מִשּׁוּם דַּחֲזַאי לִי בְּרוּחַ הַקֹּדֶשׁ דְּנָפְקִי מִינַּאי בְּנִין דְּלָא מְעַלּוּ. אֲמַר לֵיהּ: בַּהֲדֵי כַּבְשֵׁי דְרַחֲמָנָא לְמָה לָךְ? מַאי דְּמִפַּקְּדַתְּ אִיבְּעִי לָךְ לְמֶעְבַּד, וּמָה דְנִיחָא קַמֵּיהּ קוּדְשָׁא בְּרִיךְ הוּא — לַעֲבֵיד.

Hezekiah said to him: What is all of this? For what transgression am I being punished? Isaiah said to him: Because you did not marry and engage in procreation. Hezekiah apologized and said: I had no children because I envisaged through divine inspiration that the children that emerge from me will not be virtuous. Hezekiah meant that he had seen that his children were destined to be evil. In fact, his son Menashe sinned extensively, and he thought it preferable to have no children at all. Isaiah said to him: Why do you involve yourself with the secrets of the Holy One, Blessed be He? That which you have been commanded, the mitzva of procreation, you are required to perform, and that which is acceptable in the eyes of the Holy One, Blessed be He, let Him perform, as He has so decided.

Source 5 · Chazal
Verified

Yevamot 76a

יבמות ע״ו א — ד"ה מִמּוּלָאֵי

Yevamot 76a:1

The passage states that semen fertilizes when it passes through its proper place but does not fertilize when it does not pass through its proper place, and therefore one who cannot father children is like one whose testicles have been crushed and may not enter the congregation.

מִמּוּלָאֵי, אָמְרִיתוּ מִילֵּי מוּלְיָתָא? בִּמְקוֹמָהּ — מְבַשְּׁלָה, שֶׁלֹּא בִּמְקוֹמָהּ — לָא מְבַשְּׁלָה.

from truncated [mimula’ei] people, as Rav Beivai’s family traced their lineage to the house of Eli, all of whose descendants were destined to be short-lived (see I Samuel 2:31), you speak truncated [mulayata] and unsound matters. When the semen passes through its proper place, it fertilizes; but if it does not pass through its proper place, it does not fertilize. Since he cannot father children, he is like one whose testicles have been crushed, and therefore he may not enter into the congregation.

Source 6 · Rishonim
Verified

Mishneh Torah, Forbidden Intercourse 16:10

Mishneh Torah, Forbidden Intercourse 16:10

It is forbidden to waste reproductive organs or seed, whether in humans, wild animals, or birds.

אָסוּר לְהַפְסִיד אֵיבְרֵי זֶרַע בֵּין בְּאָדָם בֵּין בִּבְהֵמָה חַיָּה וְעוֹף.

Source 7 · Rishonim
Verified

Mishneh Torah, Marriage 15:1-16

משנה תורה, הלכות אישות ט״ו:א׳-ט״ז

Mishneh Torah, Marriage 15:1-16

Rambam codifies the mitzvah of procreation and related marital obligations, providing a foundational halakhic framework for issues of conception and family continuity.

לֹא יִשָּׂא אָדָם עֲקָרָה וּזְקֵנָה וְאַיְלוֹנִית וּקְטַנָּה שֶׁאֵינָהּ רְאוּיָה לֵילֵד אֶלָּא אִם כֵּן קִיֵּם מִצְוַת פְּרִיָּה וּרְבִיָּה אוֹ שֶׁהָיְתָה לוֹ אִשָּׁה אַחֶרֶת לִפְרוֹת וְלִרְבּוֹת מִמֶּנָּה. נָשָׂא אִשָּׁה וְשָׁהֲתָה עִמּוֹ עֶשֶׂר שָׁנִים וְלֹא יָלְדָה הֲרֵי זֶה יוֹצִיא וְיִתֵּן כְּתֻבָּה אוֹ יִשָּׂא אִשָּׁה הָרְאוּיָה לֵילֵד. וְאִם לֹא רָצָה לְהוֹצִיא כּוֹפִין אוֹתוֹ וּמַכִּין אוֹתוֹ בְּשׁוֹט עַד שֶׁיּוֹצִיא. וְאִם אָמַר אֵינִי בּוֹעֲלָהּ וַהֲרֵינִי שׁוֹכֵן עִמָּהּ בִּפְנֵי עֵדִים כְּדֵי שֶׁלֹּא אֶתְיַחֵד עִמָּהּ בֵּין שֶׁאָמְרָה הִיא בֵּין שֶׁאָמַר הוּא אֵין שׁוֹמְעִין אֶלָּא יוֹצִיא אוֹ יִשָּׂא אִשָּׁה הָרְאוּיָה לֵילֵד: שָׁהֲתָה עֶשֶׂר שָׁנִים וְלֹא יָלְדָה וַהֲרֵי הוּא יוֹרֶה כְּחֵץ שִׁכְבַת זֶרַע. חֶזְקַת הַחלִי מִמֶּנָּה וְתֵצֵא שֶׁלֹּא בִּכְתֻבָּה וְיֵשׁ לָהּ תּוֹסֶפֶת. לֹא תִּהְיֶה זוֹ פְּחוּתָה מֵאַיְלוֹנִית שֶׁלֹּא הִכִּיר בָּהּ שֶׁיֵּשׁ לָהּ תּוֹסֶפֶת כְּמוֹ שֶׁיִּתְבָּאֵר. וְאִם אֵינוֹ יוֹרֶה כְּחֵץ חֶזְקַת הַחלִי מִמֶּנּוּ בִּלְבַד וְיוֹצִיא וְיִתֵּן הַכְּתֻבָּה כֻּלָּהּ עִקָּר וְתוֹסֶפֶת:

A man should not marry a barren women, an elderly woman, an aylonit or a minor who is not fit to bear a child unless he has already fulfilled the mitzvah of being fruitful and multiplying, or he has another wife with whom he can father children. When a man has married a woman and remained married to her for ten years without her bearing children, he must divorce her and pay her [the money due her by virtue of her] ketubah, or marry a woman who is fit to bear children. If he does not desire to divorce her, he should be compelled to do so; he should be beaten with a rod until he divorces her. Even when he says, "I will not engage in marital relations with her. Instead, we will dwell together with witnesses so that we will not ever be in private," regardless of whether it is he or she who offers this proposition, it is not accepted. Rather, he is required to divorce [his wife] or marry another woman who is fit to bear children. When a man has lived [together with his wife] for ten years without her bearing children, and he releases semen as one shoots an arrow, it can be assumed that the affliction comes from her. Therefore, he should divorce her without paying her [the essential requirement of] the ketubah. She is, however, entitled to the additional sum [by which the ketubah was increased]. [The rationale is that] such a woman should not be judged more severely than an aylonit whose husband did not recognize her condition, who is granted the additional amount, as will be explained. If [the husband] does not [release semen] as one shoots an arrow, it can be assumed that the affliction comes from him alone. When he divorces her, he must pay her [the entire sum due her by virtue of her] ketubah: the essential requirement and the additional sum.

Source 8 · Acharonim
Verified

Arukh HaShulchan, Even HaEzer 25

ערוך השולחן, אבן העזר כ״ה

Arukh HaShulchan, Even HaEzer 25

Although one may engage with one's wife in any manner while she is ritually pure, one must not emit seed wastefully; therefore, one should engage only in the manner that leads to procreation, as this is the way to avoid the serious transgression of wasting seed.

לפיכך אע"ג דקיי"ל [שם] דכל מה שאדם רוצה לעשות באשתו עושה כשהיא טהורה, בועל בכל עת שירצה ומנשק בכל אבר שירצה ובא עליה בין בדרכה ובין שלא כדרכה או דרך אברים ובלבד שלא יוציא זרע לבטלה [טור] – מ"מ השם אורחותיו אין לו לעשות כן אלא ישמש במקום שראוי ליזרע ולהוליד דא"א להזהר שלא יוציא זרע לבטלה וכמה חמור עון זה.

Source 9 · Acharonim
Verified

Beit Yosef, Even HaEzer 25:2

בית יוסף, אבן העזר כ״ה:ב׳

Beit Yosef, Even HaEzer 25:2

A man's wife is permitted to him, so he may do with her as he wishes and have relations whenever he desires and kiss any part of her; the Rambam rules this way based on the Talmud (Niddah 13b) where Rabbi Yochanan ben Dhabai lists severe punishments for improper marital conduct, but the Sages rejected his view and ruled instead that a man may do whatever he wishes with his wife—though one should take care not to waste seed unnecessarily, as this connects to the stringent ruling that wasting seed is punishable by death.

ואשתו של אדם מותרת לפיכך כל מה שירצה לעשות באשתו עושה בועל בכל עת שירצה וינשק בכל אבר שירצה כל זה לשון הרמב"ם בפרק כ"א מהא"ב וכתב כן מדגרסינן בספ"ב דנדרים (דף כ:) א"ר יוחנן בן דהבאי חגרים מפני מה הויין מפני שהופכים שולחנם אלמים מפני מה הויין מפני שמנשקים על אותו מקום חרשים מפני מה הויין מפני שמספרים בשעת תשמיש סומים מפני מה הויין מפני שהסתכלין באותו מקום א"ר יוחנן זו דברי רבי יוחנן בן דהבאי אבל אמרו חכמים אין הלכה כיוחנן בן דהבאי אלא כל מה שאדם רוצה לעשות באשתו עושה ואמרי' תו התם ההיא דאתאי לקמיה דרבי א"ל ערכתי לו שלחן והפכו כלו' שבא עליה שלא כדרכה א"ל בתי התורה התירתך לו וכן אמר רב לאיתתא אחריתי דאתאי לקמיה ופסק הלכה כחכמים וכר' וכרב ומ"מ כתב שיזהר שלא יוציא ש"ז לבטלה כי היכי דלא תיקשי הלכתא אהלכתא ודר' יוחנן אדר' יוחנן דא"ר יוחנן בפ' כל היד (נדה יג:) הוציא ש"ז לבטלה חייב מיתה וכ"כ התוס' בשם ר"י בחד תירוצא כמו שאכתוב בסמוך:

Source 10 · Acharonim
Verified

Kli Yakar on Exodus 20:9

כלי יקר על שמות כ׳:ט׳

Kli Yakar on Exodus 20:9

The passage interprets the prohibition against adultery to include the emission of seed in vain, which is forbidden to Israel specifically because it constitutes a form of murder (shedding of blood), supported by rabbinic derash on Isaiah 1:15 referring to those who commit adultery with the hand; this stringent prohibition applies to Israel because they have maintained holiness from their ancestors and are capable of withstanding it, whereas the earlier commandments given to all nations are not enforced as strictly since nations might lack the ability to observe them.

וּמַה שֶּׁנֶּאֱמַר בְּדִבְּרוֹת אַחֲרוֹנוֹת ״לֹא תִרְצָח וְלֹא תִנְאָף״. וָי״ו מוֹסִיף עַל עִנְיָן רִאשׁוֹן לֶאֱסוֹר לְיִשְׂרָאֵל אֲפִלּוּ נִאוּף בַּיָּד לְהוֹצִיא זֶרַע לְבַטָּלָה, כִּי נִאוּף זֶה יֵשׁ בּוֹ צַד רְצִיחָה וְהַיְינוּ דַּם זַרְעִיּוֹתָיו, וְכִדְמַסִּיק בְּמַסֶּכֶת נִדָּה (יג:) אָמַר רַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר: מַאי דִּכְתִיב (ישעיה א טו) ״יְדֵיכֶם דָּמִים מָלֵאוּ״? אֵלּוּ הַמְנָאֲפִים בַּיָּד. וְכֵן דָּרְשׁוּ עַל זֶה פָּסוּק ״שֹׁחֲטֵי הַיְלָדִים בַּנְּחָלִים״ (ישעיה נז ה), אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁדָּרְשׁוּ (נִדָּה יג.) שֶׁאַל תִּקְרֵי ״שֹׁחֲטֵי״ אֶלָּא ״סֹחֲטֵי״, מִכָּל מָקוֹם קְרֵי בֵּיהּ נָמֵי ״שֹׁחֲטֵי״ מַמָּשׁ, שֶׁהֲרֵי נֶאֱמַר ״יְדֵיכֶם דָּמִים מָלֵאוּ״. וְזוֹ אַזְהָרָה לְיִשְׂרָאֵל דַּוְקָא, כִּי קְדוֹשִׁים הֵמָּה מִימוֹת אֲבוֹתֵיהֶם וְיוּכְלוּ לַעֲמוֹד בָּזֶה, אֲבָל דִּבְּרוֹת רִאשׁוֹנוֹת שֶׁנֶּאֶמְרוּ גַּם לָאֻמּוֹת לֹא רָצָה לְהַחְמִיר עֲלֵיהֶם כָּל כָּךְ, כִּי אוּלַי לֹא יוּכְלוּ לַעֲמוֹד בָּזֶה.

And what is said in the latter commandments is “You shall not murder and you shall not commit adultery.” The vav [meaning, ‘and’] adds to the first matter to prohibit to Israel even adultery with the hand, that is, to emit seed in vain, because this adultery has an aspect of murder, namely the blood of his seed. As it concludes in the tractate (Niddah 13b) Rabbi Elazar said: What is the meaning of that which is written: Your hands are full of blood (Isaiah 1:15)? This refers to those who commit adultery with the hand. And they interpreted this verse similarly: Those who slaughter children in the valleys (Isaiah 57:5). Although they interpreted (there, 13a) “do not read it as slaughter [shochatei] but as ‘squeeze’ [sochatei],” nevertheless, also actually read it as slaughter, as it says, your hands are full of blood. And this warning is specifically for Israel because they are holy from the days of their forefathers and they can withstand this, but the first commandments which were also said to the nations — He did not want to be so strict with them, because perhaps they would not be able to withstand this.

Source 11 · Acharonim
External

Igrot Moshe, Even HaEzer 1:71

אגרות משה, אה"ע א׳:ע״א

Igrot Moshe Even HaEzer 1:71

Rav Moshe Feinstein addresses artificial insemination and the halakhic issues it raises, including lineage, fatherhood, and marital boundaries.

Igrot Moshe Even HaEzer 1:71 — page scan on HebrewBooks
Page 169

Igros Moshe is not freely available in text. This PDF surfaced in our research. Please use the feedback buttons below to help us improve.

Source 12 · Acharonim
Verified

Shulchan Arukh, Even HaEzer 1

שולחן ערוך, אבן העזר א׳

Shulchan Arukh, Even HaEzer 1

The opening siman frames the mitzvah of pru u'revu and marriage obligations, supplying the practical halakhic starting point for later discussions of fertility interventions.

דיני פריה ורביה ושלא לעמוד בלא אשה. חייב כל אדם לישא אשה כדי לפרות ולרבות וכל מי שאינו עוסק בפריה ורביה כאלו שופך דמים וממעט את הדמות וגורם לשכינה שתסתלק מישראל: כיון שיש לאדם זכר ונקבה קיים מצות פריה ורביה והוא שלא יהיה הבן סריס או הנקיבה איילונית.

Source 13 · Acharonim
External

Tzitz Eliezer 15:45

ציץ אליעזר, ח״טו סי׳ מ״ה

Tzitz Eliezer 15:45

A well-known responsum dealing directly with artificial insemination, parental status, and related halakhic ramifications.

Tzitz Eliezer 15:45 — page scan on HebrewBooks
Page 124

Tzitz Eliezer is not freely available in text. This PDF surfaced in our research. Please use the feedback buttons below to help us improve.